Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Hadith Analysis’ Category

Muslims believe that Prophet (saw) was the seal of Prophethood, and when we say that we mean to say that, there will be “no divinely appointed human sent by Allah”. But a deviant sect named as qadiyanis play word games in order to fool people, they claim that Muhammad (saw) was the final prophet (NABI), but he was not a final messenger (Rasool), and there can be messengers even after  Muhammad(Saw), thus using these word games they claim that Ghulam Ahmed Qadiyani was a Rasool (messenger).

This sect was unanimously declared as kaafirs (disbelievers) by musliims, because when quran says: Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the last (end) of the Prophets(nabieen).(33:40) , it puts an end to Prophethood as well as Messengerhood. In other words it set and end to divinely appointed authorities by Allah.

It is even evident from an authentic narration:

Sahih Muslim 4.661:

Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “The Israelis used to be ruled and guided by prophets: Whenever a prophet died, another would take over his place. There will be no prophet after me, but there will be Caliphs who will increase in number.” The people asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! What do you order us (to do)?” He said, “Obey the one who will be given the pledge of allegiance first. Fulfil their (i.e. the Caliphs) rights, for Allah will ask them about (any shortcoming) in ruling those Allah has put under their guardianship.”

Comment:

This narration proves that , There will be no prophet after prophet Muhammad(saw), (mentioning that he was final prophet itself was a proof that there wasn’t any divinely appointed ruler after him) but prophet (saw) didn’t stop there, he even clarified that there wasn’t any divinely appointed person after him (Saw), because Prophet (Saw) said “obey the one who will be given the pledge of allegiance first” , if at all there was any divinely appointed caliph he would have said “obey the divinely appointed caliph after me”. But he(saw) didn’t say so, which proves that there wasn’t any divinely appointed ruler after him. This narrations leaves no doubt in the mind of intelligent and unbiased people that there will not be any divinely appointed leader after Prophet Muhammad(saw).

Belief of Shias:

Now what needs to be realized is that the beliefs of the shias aren’t that different from the Qadiyanis, even the shias are in a way deniers of seal of Prophethood and like the Qadiyanis even the shias play the word games in order to fool people.

Shias have given all the similar qualities which a Nabi (prophet) possesses, to their Imams, but they play safe when they propagate their heretic beliefs in the muslim ummah. But the truth is that just by changing the label the product doesn’t change, for example: One can sell wine labeling it as Apple Juice, and it gets an approval from Government, but changing the label doesn’t changes what is there in the bottle, it will still be wine and will be forbidden to consume. Similarly shias, have fooled their followers by making them believe in people who had the same qualities like a Prophet has, but they just termed those people not as prophets but as Imams, but changing the label doesn’t changes the reality.

Lets see what is the definition of a Prophet, Imam and Messenger and what are the differences among all these divinely appointed authorities in the light of authentic shia narrations:

Narration 1:

جُعِلْتُ فِدَاكَ أَخْبِرْنِي مَا الْفَرْقُ بَيْنَ الرَّسُولِ وَ النَّبِيِّ وَ الْإِمَامِ قَالَ فَكَتَبَ أَوْ قَالَ الْفَرْقُ بَيْنَ الرَّسُولِ وَ النَّبِيِّ وَ الْإِمَامِ أَنَّ الرَّسُولَ الَّذِي يُنْزَلُ عَلَيْهِ جَبْرَئِيلُ فَيَرَاهُ وَ يَسْمَعُ كَلَامَهُ وَ يُنْزَلُ عَلَيْهِ الْوَحْيُ وَ رُبَّمَا رَأَى فِي مَنَامِهِ نَحْوَ رُؤْيَا إِبْرَاهِيمَ ع وَ النَّبِيُّ رُبَّمَا سَمِعَ الْكَلَامَ وَ رُبَّمَا رَأَى الشَّخْصَ وَ لَمْ يَسْمَعْ وَ الْإِمَامُ هُوَ الَّذِي يَسْمَعُ الْكَلَامَ وَ لَا يَرَى الشَّخْصَ

Hasan b. Abbas once asked Imam al-Rida, peace be upon him, in a letter. “What is the difference between a messenger, a prophet, and an Imam?” The Imam answered as follows: “The messenger (rasul) is a person to whom Jibril descends and who both sees him and hears the words that he speaks. He is thus in communication with divine revelation (wahy), which he sometimes receives in the form of a dream, as was the case with Ibrahim, peace be upon him. The prophet (nabiyy) sometimes hears the words spoken by Jibril and at other times sees him without hearing anything from him. The Imam hears the words that Jibril utters without seeing him.”

Source : al-Kulayni, al-Kafi, Vol. I, p.176, hadeeth # 2

Narration 2:

مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنِ الْحَسَنِ بْنِ مَحْبُوبٍ عَنِ الْأَحْوَلِ قَالَ سَأَلْتُ أَبَا جَعْفَرٍ ع عَنِ الرَّسُولِ وَ النَّبِيِّ وَ الْمُحَدَّثِ قَالَ الرَّسُولُ الَّذِي يَأْتِيهِ جَبْرَئِيلُ قُبُلًا فَيَرَاهُ وَ يُكَلِّمُهُ فَهَذَا الرَّسُولُ وَ أَمَّا النَّبِيُّ فَهُوَ الَّذِي يَرَى فِي مَنَامِهِ نَحْوَ رُؤْيَا إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَ نَحْوَ مَا كَانَ رَأَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ص مِنْ أَسْبَابِ النُّبُوَّةِ قَبْلَ الْوَحْيِ حَتَّى أَتَاهُ جَبْرَئِيلُ ع مِنْ عِنْدِ اللَّهِ بِالرِّسَالَةِ وَ كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ ص حِينَ جُمِعَ لَهُ النُّبُوَّةُ وَ جَاءَتْهُ الرِّسَالَةُ مِنْ عِنْدِ اللَّهِ يَجِيئُهُ بِهَا جَبْرَئِيلُ وَ يُكَلِّمُهُ بِهَا قُبُلًا وَ مِنَ الْأَنْبِيَاءِ مَنْ جُمِعَ لَهُ النُّبُوَّةُ وَ يَرَى فِي مَنَامِهِ وَ يَأْتِيهِ الرُّوحُ وَ يُكَلِّمُهُ وَ يُحَدِّثُهُ مِنْ غَيْرِ أَنْ يَكُونَ يَرَى فِي الْيَقَظَةِ وَ أَمَّا الْمُحَدَّثُ فَهُوَ الَّذِي يُحَدَّثُ فَيَسْمَعُ وَ لَا يُعَايِنُ وَ لَا يَرَى فِي مَنَامِهِ

“I asked abu Ja‘far, recipient of divine supreme covenant, about the messenger, the prophet and al-Muhaddath (one to whom Divine guidance is reported). The Imam, recipient of divine supreme covenant, said, ‘A messenger is one to whom Jibril (Gabriel) comes openly. He sees him (the angel) and speaks to him. Such person is a messenger. A prophet is one who sees in his dream something like the dream of Abraham (peace be upon him). (Of such dreams) is the dream of the Messenger of Allah, recipient of divine supreme covenant, about reasons and signs of prophecy before the coming of revelation. (He would experience such dreams) until Jibril came from Allah to inform him that he was to be a messenger. In the case of Prophet Muhammad, recipient of divine supreme covenant, when prophecy was established in him then Jibril brought him the message that he was to be a messenger. Jibril would come and speak to him openly. Certain prophets, in whom prophecy had been established, saw in their dreams, the spirit who would come to them, speak and report to them but they would not see the spirit when awake.

Al-Muhaddath (Imam) is one to whom matters of Divine guidance are reported and he hears the reporting but does not see (the angel) openly or in his dream.’”

Source: Al-Kulaynee, Al-Kaafi, vol. 1, pg. 176, hadeeth # 3 Grading: Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is SaHeeH (Authentic) Mir’aat Al-’Uqool, vol. 2, pg. 289 Bahboodee said this hadeeth is SaHeeH (Authentic) SaHeeH Al-Kaafee, vol. 1, pg. 25

Here is a summary of the differences between a Messenger (Rasool), Prophet (Nabee), and Imaam (Muhaddath) in the light of these shia narrations.

  • Messengers: They see & hear the angel whether they are asleep or awake.
  • Prophets: They see & hear the angel while asleep, but when they are awake they can only hear.
  • Imaams They can ONLY hear the reports, but they DO NOT see the angel whether they are asleep or awake.

So the ONLY difference between Imam and Nabi is that, Nabi can see the angel(only in their dream), where as Imam cannot.

So when Allah said: Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the last (end) of the Prophets(nabieen).(33:40), Did Allah mean that after Prophet(Saw) no one would be able to see jibril ?

We urge every reader to ponder over the negligible difference that shias have made between Nabi and Imam, what would it change if there is going to be person who cannot see the angel(jirbil) in his dream, but can hear him, when Allah said there is not going to be a Nabi after Muhammad(Saw).

Suppose there are two people both equally intelligent, one of them is blind and other is not, now if we teach both of them through recitation a chapter, what difference will it make in the teachings they received? Does being blind would make any difference in the knowledge of the blind person? No, not at all. All the things will be the same. Because they still get the divine revelation without seeing the angel.

So saying that the only difference between Imam and Nabi is that Nabi can see the angel in his dream, where as Imam can’t and both of them can hear the angel then for those whom Allah granted sense there shouldn’t remain any doubt that, even the shias are the deniers of seal of Prophethood like qadiyanis, and they play safe using word games.

It is not for any person to believe, except by the leave of Allah, and He will put the Rijs (doubt) on those who do not reason. Quran (10:100)

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Another proof of Shiism/ Shiite lies and deception from Sunni sources. As an example the Shia website Answering-Ansar team states in their revised edition of ‘Ali un-Wali Allah; in Kalima & Adhan’:

Quoting Answering-Ansar:
The Wilayat of Maula ‘Ali (as) and the perfection of the religionJust after the declaration of the Imam Ali’s (as) guardianship, Allah (swt) revealed the verse “Al yaumu akmaltu lakum deenakum” and made it clear for everyone that though belief in the Unity of Allah, the Prophethood, prayers, fasting, pilgrimage, the payment of poor-rate and jihad already existed, without the Wilayat of Ali (as) the Religion cannot be complete and perfect.

Abu Sa’eed al-Khudri has narrated that this verse descended upon the Holy Prophet (s) on the day of Ghadir e Khum when he declared that Ali was the leader of whom ever was he. Abu Hurairah has also narrated it and he has also further said that this verse revealed on 18th of the month of Dhil-Hij when the Holy Prophet (s) returned from Hujjat al-Widah (the last pilgrimage).

1. Tafseer Ibn Katheer, volume 2, page 14, published in Egypt.            

2. Tafseer Durre Manthur, volume 2, page 259, published in Egypt.

After the narrations of the two companions Abu Sa’eed and Abu Hurairah it is crystal clear that until the Prophet (s) declared the Wilayat of Ali (as) on the day of Ghadir e Khum, Allah (swt) did not declare the religion to be perfected until this happened. Now, when without the declaration of the Wilayat of Ali (as) the religion is incomplete, then how can the Kalima and Adhan of the Muslims be complete without it?

Ali un-Wali Allah; in Kalima & Adhan, page 8

However, the only thing that becomes crystal clear after reading this quote cited by the Answering-Ansar team and checking the two referenced texts is that this is an outright case of misquoting and distorting Sunnī texts.

The verse inaccurately transliterated and mentioned by the Answering-Ansar team is a part of a longer verse:

الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ وَأَتْمَمْتُ عَلَيْكُمْ نِعْمَتِي وَرَضِيتُ لَكُمُ الْإِسْلَامَ دِينًا

“Today, I have perfected your religion for you, and have completed My blessing upon you, and chosen Islam as religion and a way of life for you.” [Surah al-Ma’idah 5:3]

And the references provided for the quote mentioning the two narrations which support the argument of Answering-Ansar are:

1.      Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-`Ažīm of Abū al-Fidā’ Ibn Kathīr (d. 774)

2.      al-Durr al-Manthūr fi al-Tafsīr bi al-Ma’thūr of Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūţī (d. 911)

Let us now check these two references and see what the authors of these two books have, in reality, said in their works.

The Tafsīr of Ibn Kathīr

What Ibn Kathīr actually states about this verse and those two narrations in his Tafsīr is:

وقد روى ابن مردويه من طريق أبي هارون العبدي عن أبي سعيد الخدري أنها نزلت على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يوم غدير خم حين قال لعلي من كنت مولاه فعلي مولاه ثم رواه عن أبي هريرة وفيه أنه اليوم الثامن عشر من ذي الحجة يعني مرجعه عليه السلام من حجة الوداع ولا يصح لا هذا ولا هذا بل الصواب الذي لا شك فيه ولا مرية أنها أنزلت يوم عرفة وكان يوم جمعة كما روى ذلك أمير المؤمنين عمر بن الخطاب وعلي بن أبي طالب وأول ملوك الاسلام معاوية بن أبي سفيان وترجمان القرآن عبد الله بن عباس وسمرة بن جندب رضي الله عنه وأرسله الشعبي وقتادة بن دعامة وشهر بن حوشب وغير واحد من الأئمة والعلماء واختاره ابن جرير الطبري رحمه الله

“Ibn Mardawayh has narrated with the chain of Abū Hārūn al-`Abdī, from Abū Sa`īd al-Khudrī that it was revealed upon the Messenger of Allāh (saws) on the day of Ghadīr Khumm, when he said to `Alī: ‘Anyone whose mawlá I am, `Ali is his mawlá.’ Then he also narrated that from Abū Hurayra, which included that it was the eighteenth day of Dhū al-Ĥijja, which means the day of his (saws) return from Ĥijjat al-Widā`. This, however, is not authentic; neither the first (narration) nor the second. Rather, the correct opinion, in which there is no doubt and dispute, is that the verse was revealed on the day of `Arafa, and that was on a Friday, as narrated by the Commander of the Believers, `Umar ibn al-Khaţţāb, `Alī ibn Abī Ţālib; the first king of Islam, Mu`āwiya ibn Abī Sufyān, `Abd Allāh ibn `Abbās, the dragoman of the Qur’ān and Samura ibn Jundub (ra), and reported in a dispatched manner by al-Sha`bī, Qatāda ibn Di`āma, Shahr ibn Ĥawshab and several others from among the Imāms and scholars; and this is the opinion preferred by Ibn Jarīr al-Ţabarī (ra).”

Ibn Kathīr’s words in his Tafsīr have been, as obvious, half-quoted by the Answering-Ansar team to deceive the readers.

al-Durr al-Manthūr of al-Suyūţī

al-Suyūţī, after mentioning several authentic narrations from Şaĥīĥ al-Bukhārī and other Sunnī texts that disprove the notion pushed forth by the Answering-Ansar team about the verse in discussion, writes:

وأخرج ابن مردويه وابن عساكر بسند ضعيف عن أبي سعيد الخدري قال لما نصب رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم عليا يوم غدير خم فنادى له بالولاية هبط جبريل عليه بهذه الآية اليوم أكملت لكم دينكم وأخرج ابن مردويه والخطيب وابن عساكر بسند ضعيف عن أبي هريرة قال لما كان يوم غدير خم وهو يوم ثماني عشر من ذي الحجة قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم من كنت مولاه فعلى مولاه فأنزل الله اليوم أكملت لكم دينكم

“It is documented by Ibn Mardawayh and Ibn `Asākir, with a weak chain of transmission, from Abū Sa`īd al-Khudrī that he said: ‘When the Messenger of Allāh (saws) appointed `Alī on the day of Ghadīr Khumm and announced the guardianship for him, Jibrīl descended upon him with this verse: ‘Today, I have perfected your religion for you…’’ [5:3]. And Ibn Mardawayh, al-Khaţīb and Ibn `Asākir document, with a weak chain of transmission, from Abū Hurayra that he said: ‘When it was the day of Ghadīr Khumm, which was the eighteenth day of Dhū al-Ĥijja, the Prophet (saws) said: ‘Anyone whose mawlá I am, `Ali is his mawlá.’ So, Allāh revealed ‘‘Today, I have perfected your religion for you…’’ [5:3].”

It is clear from al-Suyūţī’s actual words in al-Durr al-Manthūr that the narrations of these two Companions (ra) are unreliable, for they are related with a weak chain of transmission. This part, of course, was deceptively left out by the Answering-Ansar team. Readers should read the quotes of Ibn Kathīr and al-Suyūţī again, and compare it to what Answering-Ansar quotes:

Quoting Answering-Ansar:
Abu Sa’eed al-Khudri has narrated that this verse descended upon the Holy Prophet (s) on the day of Ghadir e Khum when he declared that Ali was the leader of whom ever was he. Abu Hurairah has also narrated it and he has also further said that this verse revealed on 18th of the month of Dhil-Hij when the Holy Prophet (s) returned from Hujjat al-Widah (the last pilgrimage).1. Tafseer Ibn Katheer, volume 2, page 14, published in Egypt.            

2. Tafseer Durre Manthur, volume 2, page 259, published in Egypt.

Ali un-Wali Allah; in Kalima & Adhan, page 8

The misquotation and distortion is quite clear.

Why Such Deception?

It should be evident to all from reading the above that had the Answering-Ansar team completely quoted what Ibn Kathīr and al-Suyūţī said while mentioning these two narrations, it would have been impossible for them to substantiate their argument and say:

Quoting Answering-Ansar:
After the narrations of the two companions Abu Sa’eed and Abu Hurairah it is crystal clear that until the Prophet (s) declared the Wilayat of Ali (as) on the day of Ghadir e Khum, Allah (swt) did not declare the religion to be perfected until this happened. Now, when without the declaration of the Wilayat of Ali (as) the religion is incomplete, then how can the Kalima and Adhan of the Muslims be complete without it?

Ali un-Wali Allah; in Kalima & Adhan, page 8

Thus, of course, they chose the Shī`ī way of handling Sunnī texts, by misquoting them to give readers the entirely opposite picture of what they really mention and establish.

May Allāh (swt) save us from deception and misquotation of religious texts.

It is only Allah (swt) who gives success, and blessings and peace be on the Seal of the Prophets, his Pure Progeny and his Noble Companions.

Read Full Post »

Alee (Radhiallaahu Anhu) said,

“A nation (a group of people) who love me will enter the Hell fire due to their (blind extreme) love of me, similarly a nation having animosity towards me will enter the Hell fire due to their animosity.”

(Kitaab Fadhaa’il as-Sahaabah 2/565 no.952 Shaikh Zubair Alee said, Its chain is authentic, Kitaab as-Sunnah no.983 of Ibn Abee Aasim, Shaikh Zubair Alee authenticated it.)

Alee (Radhiallaahu Anhu) also said,

“Two men (types of ie groups) will be destroyed concerning me, one who is extreme in exaggeration (in love of me) and the other who is extreme in his animosity towards me.”

(Fadhaa’il as-Sahaabah 2/571 no.964 Shaikh Zubair Alee said, Its chain is authentic)

 

Courtesy of  ahlulhadeeth.wordpress.com

 

Read Full Post »

Bismillah

All praises due to Allah, and May His peace and blessings be upon His Last and Final Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and companions.

Shia Encyclopedia has great fame among shia so called internet debaters. They rely on this online encyclopedia assuming it to be a great research. But the fact is this work is full of weak and fabricated narrations. This Takhreej is a small effort to analyze the authenticity of narrations present outside the two Sahih.

This Part-1 include analysis of following narrations:

[1]. I am leaving behind two commands: the Book of Allah and my Sunnah.”

[2].I am leaving for you two precious and weighty Symbols that if you adhere to both of them you shall not go astray after me. They are, the Book of Allah, and my progeny, that is my Ahlul-Bayt.”

[3]. “Ali is with Quran, and Quran is with Ali.”

[4]. “Behold! My Ahlul-Bayt are like the Ark of Noah. Whoever embarked in it was saved, and whoever turned away from it was perished.

[5]. “Do not be ahead of them (Ahlul Bayt) for you will perish, do not turn away from them for you will perish, and do not try to teach them since they know more than you do!

[6]. “My Ahlul-Bayt are like the Gate of Repentance (Baab Hittah) of the Children of Israel; whoever entered therein was forgiven.”

[7]. “O folk! I am soon going to depart from here, and although I have already told you, I repeat once more that I am leaving with you two things, namely, the Book of Allah and my descendants, that is, my Ahlul-Bayt.” Then he lifted Ali by the hand and said: “Behold! This Ali is with the Quran and the Quran is with him. These two shall never separate from each other until they come to me at the Pool of Kawthar.”

[8]. “Whosoever wishes to live and die like me and enter that heaven (after death), which my lord has promised me, namely, the everlasting heaven should acknowledge Ali (AS) as his patron after me, and after him he should acknowledge the sons of Ali.”

[9]. “Regard the Ahlul-Bayt among you as the head to the body or the eyes to the face, for the face is only guided by the eyes.”

[10]. “My Ahlul-Bayt are the protected place of refuge about the dispute in religion.”

Download word file: Takhreej Shia Encyclopedia Part-1

http://alsonnah.wordpress.com/2012/01/30/takhreej-of-narrations-present-in-shia-encyclopedia-part-1/

Read Full Post »

SHIITES AND SHIAISM

Shiaism (The Rafidah) and Islam are indeed different religions. This sect has developed into what we now know as the Shia whose beliefs and thoughts are repugnant beyond belief. The divergence of Shiaism from Islaam can be summarized from the books which they consider most authentic, and the statements of their most respected scholars.

Some of the proofs are available on this page Most of the Muslim UMMAH and Western scholars have very little genuine and reliable knowledge of SHIA beliefs and practices. However, most of the openly declared SHIA beliefs revolve around The Concept of Imamah, the superiority of Ali (May Allah be pleased with him), and the so-called love of the Prophet’s family members. As a result, the intense love that Sunni Muslims carry for the Prophet’s family members combined with the magnanimous personality of Ali has led some Sunnis to accept Shia’s as part of the Muslim UMMAH.

However, the brutal fact remains that under the pretense of Ali’s Superiority and the so-called love of the Prophet’s family members, Shias have literally evolved an entirely new religion, grossly distorted the teachings of the Holy Qur’ân, and completely rejected the sanctity and authenticity of the Hadeeth. They have elevated the sayings of their imams to the level of the Prophet’s sayings and have classified them as Hadeeth.

For all practical purposes, they reject the most authentic sayings of the Prophet (Peace be upon him) and base their religion on the so-called Hadeeth attributed to their Imaams. By doing so they have rejected one of the most fundamental principles of Islam: The law can only be derived from the sayings and actions of the Prophet (Peace be upon him), not any other human being.

The Saba’iyyah, a sect of the Rawafid, emerged in the time of `Ali and told `Ali he was God. `Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) burned some of them to death as a result. Later, the Rawafid split into many groups like: The Zaydis, Imamis, Kaysaniyyas, Qaddahiyyas  and Exaggerators (Ghullat). Some people asked Imam Zayd ibn `Ali to disavow Abu Bakr and `Umar. He would not do so, and some people refused his decision, and deserted him, thereby becoming known as Rawafid, which means : the Refusers, the Rejecters.

Those who stayed with him became known as the Zaydis, and so they are technically not of the Rawafid. The exaggerators are not Muslims, these Raafidi (Shia) actually descend from Abu Lu’luah Majoosi (a Persian fire worshipper) and Abdullaah ibn Saba’ (a Jew). However they are more dangerous from the Christians themselves. Christians fight Islaam face to face (if they did) while Rafidiyah stab Islam from its back they have lot of Absurdities in their beliefs like Badah, Rajah, Mutah, Taqiyyah, etc

The Zaydis, Imamis and exaggerators split up further, with each group accusing the other of kufr. The Zaydis split into three groups: Jarudis, Sulaymanis and Butris. They all agreed on the leadership of Imam Zayd ibn `Ali ibn al-Husayn when he revolted at the time of Hisham ibn `Abdul-Malik.

They are the closest of the Shiah to Ahlus-Sunnah; they merely maintain that `Ali had more right to the Caliphate, but they do not claim that he was explicitly appointed as Caliph by the Prophet (may Allah bless him and his Household and grant them peace), and hence they accept the Caliphates of Abu Bakr, `Umar and `Uthman. The Kisanis split into two groups: one claimed that Muhammad ibn Hanafiyyah, a son of `Ali, is still alive and that he is the Mahdi; the other group say he died and passed on the leadership.

The Imamis and exaggerators split into fifteen groups, among which are the Ja`faris/Ithna `Asharis (Twelvers) and the Isma`ilis. The exaggerators claimed divinity for their Imams, permitted all sorts of haram things, and in short dismissed the obligations of shari`ah.

Below we have more then 100 Articles exposing Shia’s using their own books and writings with detailed sources so that they don’t deny it. These references are copied from the religious books of Shiite religion. While translating them we have asked forgiveness of Allah many times, for, these are very much annoying for any Muslim to read. Neither I personally wish anyone to have them but to save the innocent simple Muslims from the Shiites (Raafidah) it was necessary to write them and forward them to our fellow Muslims so that they can know the real terrifying beliefs of Shiites.

Additionally I have also listed some articles about Ismailism and the Agakhanis; one of the more deviant groups within the Shia religion they are an offshoot of the Raafidah (Shiah) and share some of their characteristics. Aga Khan is their supreme leader and, in their view, has characteristics and attributes similar to those of Allaah.

And Lastly The Prophet  said: “Whoever abuses my Companions, upon them is the curse of Allah, the Angles and all the people” (Saheeh, At-Tabaranee)

For those who feel that speaking against this deviant pseudo-Islamic group is waste of time ….First read this then go ahead with other Articles pertaining to Shiite and Shiaism

The historic Khutbah of Sheikh Ali Abd-ur-Rahman al-Hudhaifi, Imaam of Masjid-e-Nabavi

*the Peshawar Nights

Exposing the shiite Al-Tijani Al-Samawi’s Lies in His Book:  “Then I was Guided”

*First: Answering Al-Tijani’s Libels against Abu Hurairah

Second: Answering Al-Tijani in his claim that the four Sunni Imams learned knowledge from Imam Jaffar Al-Saddiq

*Third: Answering Al-Tijani’s allegations against Mu’awiyah bin Abi Sufyan

*Fourth: Al-Tijani’s Allegations against the Mother of Beleivers Ayesha ( may Allah be pleased at her )

*Fifth: Answering Al-Tijani’s Libels against Uthman Ibn Affan

In Defense of Abu Hurairah [Reply to some erroneous claims]

What Do Scholars of the Past and Present say about Shia (Rafidah) ?

Al-Kafi is the MOST reliable Shia Book Al-Kafi was presented to the legendary Imam Qaem who liked it and said: “It suffices our Shi’ites”

How to Approach the Shia Brothers and Sisters A Straight Forward Logic Instead of a Never Ending Debate?

do sHIA HAS DIFFERENT KALIMAH?

Are Shia Kafir?

WHAT IS THE AQEEDAH OF SHIAS?

have seen the terrifying BELIEFS OF SHIITES?

*WHAT ARE The Beliefs of Khomeini the Leader of the Iranian Revolution?

What the Shiites say about AHLUS SUNNAH Muslims?

WHAT ARE THE SHIITES BELIEFS REGARDING ALLAH?

*WHAT ARE THE SHIITES BELIEFS REGARDING PROPHETHOOD?

*WHAT ARE THE SHIITE BELIEFS REGARDING THE COMPANIONS OF THE PROPHET? (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam)

WHAT ARE THE SHIITE BELIEFS ABOUT THE NOBLE MOTHERS OF UMMAH AND WIVES OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD (SAWS)?

WHAT ARE THE SHIITE BELIEFS ABOUT THE FAMILY OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam)?

what are the SHIA BELIEF CONCERNING RAJ’AH?

what are the SHIA BELIEF CONCERNING TAQIYYAH?

what are the SHIA BELIEF CONCERNING Mut’ah?

what are the SHIA BELIEF regarding women?

Who invented the Shia’s sect?  What is the origin of the Shiaism?

racism in Shiite religion

what is the REALITY OF MAATAM?

Who are the Ahlul Bayt?

Who Killed Al-Hussain?

WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE IN KILLING OF KARBALÂ?

Unmasking the other villains of Karbalâ

*THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SHEE’AH AND MUSLIMS WHO FOLLOW THE SUNNAH

Answering-Ansar.org Exposed!

The Role of Zoroastrianism in the Development of Shiism

The similarity between Shia rituals and Christian rituals

IS THIS YOU CALL ISLAAM?

GRAVE WORSHIP

LOOK AT THIS PICTURE

MARTYRDOM

As-Sahabah

*Insincerity of the Shiites

EXCELLENT BOOK WRITTEN BY Ehsaan Elahi Zaheer REGARDING SHIITES TRUE BELIEF, ORIGIN AND HISTORY

The History of the Shia

MEMORANDUM ON AGA KHAN

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE AGAKHANS

THE MYTH OF THE SHIA MAHDI

Who is True Imam Mahdi?

The 12th Imam of the Shiites is the Jewish Anti Christ (Dajjal)

Iran’s Fifty-year Plan to export the revolution and spread Sheism

Shiaism EXPOSITION AND REFUTATION OF SOURCES

An Exposition of the Fallacy of Shiite Beliefs
From Their Own Sources

Absurdities of Ithna Ashari works.

Mistakes of Shiite “Infallibles” in the Shiite sources.

Distortion of Historical Facts

The Shia practice of the forbidden temporary marriage

ya allah 0r ya ali, ya hussain

The Marriage of umm kulthum daughter of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib to ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab

Some Aspects of the Shiite Religion – Be Warned…

The Qur’ân and Imamah

*Quran VS. Shia!

The Plight of Sunni ‘Ulama in Iran

The Dismal Reality of Ahlus Sunnah in Iran

*A time line of Shiite/Raafidah treasons to Islam and crimes against Muslims

*Shiite Belief that the present Quran is fabricated

* Fataawaa of Muslim Scholars on Khomeini

*SHIAS BELIEVE THAT LIKE APOSTLES THE IMAAM TOO WERE NOMINATED BY GOD

Temporary Marriage & Its Illegitimacy in Islam 

Zawaaj Al- Mut’aa

*Whats in the ‘Kashful Asrar’ (book of khomeni)?

The vicious & unscrupulous propaganda of the Shi’ia-1

The vicious & unscrupulous propaganda of the Shi’ia-2

Islam, QADIANISM and Shiaism

Islamic Revolution of Iran??

embassy of the Islaamic republic of iran

Riots in Kermanshah

SHIA!!! BEWARE OF THE SHIITES

*Taqrib – A Study of Attempts at Sunni-Shia
Rapprochement in History

*a scientific dialouge- the tat’heer {purification}
verses & ahaadeeth of kisa’a {veil}

*Fadak Area between Abu Bakr & Fatimah

Concerning The Book ‘Nahjatul Baalighah’

The Creed Of SHIIA

BIO-DATA OF ISMAILI SHIA

The Verse of Tabligh (Conveyance)

THE VERSES OF WILAAYAH

HOW MANY ARE SHIAS altogether?

Is the fast of the ninth and tenth of Muharram recommended?

What  is recommended for the Muslim on the day of ‘Aashooraa.

Alee ibn Abee Talib on the allegations against Abu Bakr and ‘Umar

what these SHIAS don’t know about kHALIFAH ABU BAKR SIDDEEQ RadiAllaahuanhu (632-634 C.E.) “If I were to take a friend other than my Lord, I would take Abu Bakr as a friend.” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shias dont know about kHALIFAH UMAR FAAROOQUERadiAllaahuanhu (634-644 C.E.) “God has placed truth upon Umar’s tongue and heart” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shias don’t know about kHALIFAH UTHMAAN GANI RadiAllaahuanhu (644-656 C.E.) “Every Prophet has an assistant, and my assistant will be Uthmaan.” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shias don’t know about kHALIFAH ALI RadiAllaahuanhu (656-661 C.E.) “You [Ali] are my brother in this world and the next.” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shais don’t know about fatimah Bint MuhammadRadiAllaahuanha

What these shias don’t know about aa’ishah Bint Abu BakrRadi Allahu anha

what these shias don’t know about (abdur-rehmaan) abu Hurairah RadiAllaahuanhu “The kitten man”, literally “The father of a kitten” because like the Prophet he was fond of cats and since his childhood often had a cat to play with.

The Noble Character of Ameer Mu’aawiyah (ra)-The Most Slandered Pious Companion of the Prophet.

The Best Generation

SAHABAH ATTITUDE TOWARDS BID’AH

Virtues of Aboo Bakr As-Siddeeq

Integrity of the Prophet’s Companions

The Path of Ahlus-Sunnah Wal-Jama’ah

the views of ahlus-sunnah towards the Sahâbah

*Are the Sahaba Hypocrites?

Ahl Al-Bait, ‘Ummahat Al-Mu’minin

*A Glimpse at the Way of the Companions Tasfiyah-wat- Tarbiyah

In Defense of Abu Hurairah [Reply to some erroneous claims]

ABANDONING ACTING ON WEAK AHAADEETH EVEN WITH REGARD TO its  EXCELLENT ACTION

Link : http://www.allaahuakbar.in/shiites/index.htm

 

Read Full Post »

We all know that some shia hadiths are narrated by donkeys:

Now here we go again for the second time, this time narrator is not donkey but an ALIEN!!!

Shia grand sheikhs: al-Saduq (In al-Tawheed) and al-Tusi (In Tahtheeb al-Ahkam & others) & of course in other shia books as well narrated Ahadith from the Imams but in the Sanad was a Narrator called ‘Imarah ibn Zaid “عمارة ابن زيد” that came from the sky!! :D

1. Rijaal Al-Nijashi:

عمارة بن زيد أبو زيد الخيواني الهمداني لا يعرف من أمره غير هذا ذكر الحسين بن عبيد الله أنه سمع بعض أصحابنا يقول: سئل عبد الله بن محمد البلوي: من عمارة بن زيد هذا الذي حدثك؟ قال: رجل نزل من السماء حدثني ثم عرج ـ

He came down from sky, narrated/reported to me, then went away (back in sky).

Source: Nijashi – 827/303

2. Rijaal Ghidairi:

عمارة بن زيد، الخيواني، المدني، حليف الأنصار، وهذا نسبه على ما زعمه عبد الله بن محمد البلوي المصري فإنه لا يعرف إلا من جهته. وقد سئل عبد الله عنه، فقيل له: من عمارة هذا الذي تروي عنه؟ فقال: رجل نزل من السماء، فحدثني، ثم عرج. وأصحابنا يقولون: إن اسمه ما تحته أحد. وكل ما يرويه كذب، والكذب بين في وجه حديثه ـ

He came down from sky, narrated/reported to me, then went away (back in sky).

Source: Ghidairi – 89/77

3. قال النجاشي : ” عمارة بن زيد ، أبوزيد ( الخيواني ) الحبواني الهمداني لا يعرف من أمره غير هذا ، ذكر الحسين بن عبيد الله ، أنه سمع بعض أصحابنا يقول : سئل عبدالله بن محمد البلوي عن عمارة بن زيد ، ( من ظ ) هذا الذي حدثك ؟ قال : رجل نزل من السماء ، حدثني ثم عرج ! .
وينسب إليه كتب ، منها : كتاب المغازي ، كتاب حروب أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام ، كتاب مقتل الحسين بن علي عليه السلام ، وأشياء كثيرة تنسب إليه ، والله أعلم ” .
وقال ابن الغضائري : ” عمارة بن زيد الخيواني المدني : حليف الانصار وهذا نسبه على ما زعمه عبدالله بن محمد البلوي المصري ، فإنه لايعرف إلا من جهته ، وقد سئل عنه ، فقيل له : من عمارة هذا الذي تروي عنه ؟ فقال : رجل نزل من السماء فحدثني ثم عرج وأصحابنا يقولون إنه اسم ماتحته أحد ، وكل ما يرويه كذب والكذب بين في وجه حديثه ” .
روى عن أبي عامر الساجي ( السائي ) ( البناني ) واعظ أهل الحجاز وروى عنه عبدالله بن محمد البلوي . التهذيب : الجزء 6 ، باب فضل زيارته ( أمير المؤمنين ) عليه السلام ، الحديث 50 ، وباب من الزيادات ، الحديث 189 .

This man “went down from the sky” and gave a hadith and books wich titles are :
– Book of battles
– Book of wars of Ali
– Book of murder of Husayn
and “lot of other works” in the text.

source: Rijal Mu’jam Al Khuï

And here are the ahadith found that rafidi shia’s biggest scholars al-Saduq and al-Tusi narrate from this “man” in their books:

التوحيد – الشيخ الصدوق – ص 77 – 79
أخبرني أبو العباس الفضل بن الفضل بن العباس الكندي فيما أجازه لي بهمدان سنة أربع وخمسين وثلاثمائة ، قال : حدثنا محمد بن سهل يعني العطار البغدادي لفظا من كتابه سنة خمس وثلاثمائة ، قال : حدثنا عبد الله بن محمد البلوي قال : حدثني عمارة بن زيد ، قال : حدثني عبد الله بن العلاء ( 4 ) قال : حدثني صالح بن سبيع ، عن عمرو بن محمد بن صعصعة بن صوحان ( 1 ) قال : حدثني أبي عن أبي المعتمر مسلم بن أوس ، قال : حضرت مجلس علي عليه السلام في جامع الكوفة فقام إليه رجل مصفر اللون – كأنه من متهودة اليمن – فقال : يا أمير المؤمنين صف لنا خالقك وانعته لنا كأنا نراه وننظر إليه ، فسبح علي عليه السلام ربه وعظمه عز وجل وقال : الحمد لله الذي هو أول بلا بدئ مما ( 2 ) ولا باطن فيما ، ولا يزال مهما ( 3 ) ولا ممازج مع ما ، ولا خيال وهما ( 4 ) ليس بشبح فيرى ، ولا بجسم فيتجزأ ، ولا بذي غاية فيتناهى ، ولا بمحدث فيبصر ، ولا بمستتر فيكشف ، ولا بذي حجب فيحوى ( 5 ) كان ولا أماكن تحمله أكنافها ، ولا حملة ترفعه بقوتها ، ولا كان بعد أن لم يكن ، بل حارث الأوهام أن تكيف المكيف للأشياء ومن لم يزل بلا مكان ، ولا يزول باختلاف الأزمان ، ولا ينقلب شأنا بعد شأن ( 6 ) ، البعيد من حدس ‹ صفحة 79 › القلوب ( 1 ) المتعالي عن الأشياء والضروب ، والوتر ، علام الغيوب ، فمعاني الخلق عنه منفية ، وسرائرهم عليه غير خفية ، المعروف بغير كيفية ، لا يدرك بالحواس ، ولا يقاس بالناس ، ولا تدركه الأبصار ، ولا تحيط به الأفكار ، ولا تقدره العقول ، ولا تقع عليه الأوهام ، فكل ما قدره عقل أو عرف له مثل فهو محدود ، وكيف يوصف بالأشباح ، و ينعت بالألسن الفصاح ؟ من لم يحلل في الأشياء فيقال هو فيها كائن ، ولم ينأ عنها فيقال هو عنها بائن ، ولم يخل منها فيقال أين ، ولم يقرب منها بالالتزاق ، ولم يبعد عنها بالافتراق ، بل هو في الأشياء بلا كيفية ، وهو أقرب إلينا من حبل الوريد ، وأبعد من الشبه من كل بعيد ( 2 ) لم يخلق الأشياء من أصول أزلية ، ولا من أوائل كانت قبله بدية ( 3 ) بل خلق ما خلق ، وأتقن خلقه ، وصور ما صور ، فأحسن صورته ، فسبحان من توحد في علوه ، فليس لشئ منه امتناع ، ولا له بطاعة أحد من خلقه انتفاع ، إجابته للداعين سريعة ، والملائكة له في السماوات والأرض مطيعة ، كلم موسى تكليما بلا جوارح وأدوات ولا شفة ولا لهوات ( 4 ) سبحانه و تعالى عن الصفات ، فمن زعم أن إله الخلق محدود فقد جهل الخالق المعبود – و الخطبة طويلة أخذنا منها موضع الحاجة –

تهذيب الأحكام – الشيخ الطوسي – ج 6 – ص 22
وعنه عن محمد بن علي بن الفضل قال : اخبرني الحسين ابن محمد بن الفرزدق قال : حدثنا علي بن موسى بن الأحول قال : حدثنا محمد بن أبي السري املاءا قال : حدثني عبد الله بن محمد البلوى قال :حدثنا عمارة بن زيد عن أبي عامر الساجي واعظ أهل الحجاز قال : اتيت أبا عبد الله جعفر بن محمد ( عليهما السلام ) فقلت له : يا بن رسول الله ما لمن زار قبره – يعني أمير المؤمنين – وعمر تربته قال : يا أبا عامر حدثني أبي عن أبيه عن جده الحسين بن علي عن علي ( عليه السلام ) ان النبي ( صلى الله عليه وآله ) قال له : والله لتقتلن بأرض العراق وتدفن بها ، قلت : يا رسول الله ما لمن زار قبورنا وعمرها وتعاهدها ؟ فقال لي : يا أبا الحسن ان الله جعل قبرك وقبر ولدك بقاعا من بقاع الجنة وعرصة من عرصاتها ، وان الله جعل قلوب نجباء من خلقه وصفوته من عباده تحن إليكم وتحتمل المذلة والأذى فيكم ، فيعمرون قبوركم ويكثرون زيارتها تقربا منهم إلى الله مودة منهم لرسوله ، أولئك يا علي المخصوصون بشفاعتي والواردون حوضي ، وهم زواري غدا في الجنة ، يا علي من عمر قبوركم وتعاهدها فكأنما أعان سليمان بن داود على بناء بيت المقدس ، ومن زار قبوركم عدل ذلك له ثواب سبعين حجة بعد حجة الاسلام ، وخرج من ذنوبه حتى يرجع من زيارتكم كيوم ولدته أمه ، فأبشر وبشر أولياءك ومحبيك من النعيم وقرة العين بما لا عين رأت ولا اذن سمعت ولا خطر على قلب بشر ، ولكن حثالة من الناس يعيرون زوار قبوركم بزيارتكم كما تعير الزانية بزناها ، أولئك شرار أمتي لا نالتهم شفاعتي ولا يردون حوضي .

الأمالي – الشيخ الطوسي – ص 210 – 211
أخبرنا محمد بن محمد ، قال : حدثني أبو حفص محمد بن عثمان الصيرفي ، قال : أخبرني أبو بكر محمد بن عبد الله العلاف – المعروف بالمستغني – قراءة عليه ، قال : حدثنا محمد بن أبي يعقوب الدينوري ، قال : حدثنا عبد الله بن محمد البلوي ، قال : حدثنا عمارة بن زيد ، قال : حدثني بكر بن حارثة الزهري ، عن ‹ صفحة 211 › عبد الرحمن بن كعب بن مالك ، عن جابر بن عبد الله ، قال : سمعت عليا ( عليه السلام ) ينشد ، ورسول الله ( صلى الله عليه وآله ) يسمع : أنا أخو المصطفى لاشك في نسبي * معه ربيت وسبطاه هما ولدي جدي وجد رسول الله منفرد * وفاطم زوجتي لا قول ذي فند فالحمد لله شكرا لا شريك له * البر بالعبد والباقي بلا أمد قال : فابتسم رسول الله ( صلى الله عليه وآله ) وقال : صدقت يا علي .

May Allah save the shia laymen from the fairy tales of the Shia Majoos scholars.

Read Full Post »

Hatred and takfir of Shia rafidah towards inhabitants of Makkah and Madinah. From Shia authentic book – al-Kafi.

Muhammad Yaqub al-Kulayni narrated in “al-Kafi” (2/410).

عِدَّةٌ مِنْ أَصْحَابِنَا عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ خَالِدٍ عَنْ عُثْمَانَ بْنِ عِيسَى عَنْ سَمَاعَةَ عَنْ أَبِي بَصِيرٍ عَنْ أَحَدِهِمَا ( عليهما السلام ) قَالَ إِنَّ أَهْلَ مَكَّةَ لَيَكْفُرُونَ بِاللَّهِ جَهْرَةً وَ إِنَّ أَهْلَ الْمَدِينَةِ أَخْبَثُ مِنْ أَهْلِ مَكَّةَ أَخْبَثُ مِنْهُمْ سَبْعِينَ ضِعْفاً .

From one of them (either Abu Jafar or Abu Abdullah):  “Inhabitants of Makkah openly disbelieved in Allah, and inhabitants of Madinah worse than them, worse from them 70 weak (or they –  inhabitants of Madinah –  70 times worse than them).”

Majlisi said Hadith Muwathaq.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: