Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘History’ Category

Praise be to Allah. This is a good article in refutation of shia claim that Umar (ra) hit Fatima (ra).
In this article on one example we would show again how shia scholars tricked their readers in the attempt to misguide them. …
From Shia sources:
Baqir Sharif al-Qurashi, shia writer in his book about Fatima, which was translated into english language said:
Ash-Shahristani mentioned from an-Nidham that Umar was shouting: ‘Set fire to her (Fatima) house with all those in it.’ There were no but Ali, Fatima, al-Hasan, and al-Husayn inside the house.’
Source: The Life of Fatima az-Zahra, chapter The attack on Imam Ali’s house
This claim in this or other form was repeated and recorded by other shia scholars and writers.
Let us see original book of Shahristani to see what important part was dropped of by them.
Scan from “Milal wa Nihal” 1/51, Darul Kutub al-Ilmiyah:
 وزاد في الفرية فقال: إن عمر ضرب بطن فاطمة يوم البيعة حتى ألقت الجنين من بطنها وكان يصيح: أحرقوا دارها بمن فيها وما كان في الدار غير علي وفاطمة والحسن والحسين.
Translation:
And he (Nadham) added to this FALSE CLAIM: Umar hit Fatima’s belly in the day of pledge in such way that embryo fell from her womb, and he was shouting: Set fire to her (Fatima) house with all those in it.’ There were no but Ali, Fatima, al-Hasan, and al-Husayn inside the house.
Discussion:
1) First as it clear, in accordance to Shahristani this claim of Nadham was nothing but lie and false claim. But shia author didn’t mention this at all. That is same as if we would quote hadith from Mojam ar-Rijal of al-Khui, regarding which he said it is lie and fabrication, without mentioning his opinion. This is nothing but trick and clear lie.
2) Who is Nadham? That was Ibrahim ibn Sayyar ibn Hani, an-Nadham. Motazili, with many false beliefs. Shahristani quoted them one by one, and I would list some of them:
a) Nadham said: Allah have no power over evil deeds and sins, they are not under his authority.
b) He rejected idea that Allah has His own Will (Irada).
c) He rejected idea that Ijma of nation is a proof in any question.
d) He clearly supported shia idea of Imamate of Ali, and attacked companions.

Read Full Post »

Allaamah ash-Shaikh Ehsaan Elaahi Zaheer, the refuter of the Deviant sects said,

in 1980 during the time of Hajj in Makkah some major shee’ah scholars came to meet me to talk about my book, ‘ash-Shee’ah Was-Sunnah’ (a forthcoming publication on this Blog Insha’Allaah) and whilst talking they said to me,

“It was not pertinent or befitting for you to have written and published this book (ie ash-Shee’ah Was-Sunnah) at this time due to the current situation (ie the Iraaq-Iraan War 1980-1988).”

So I replied,

“Yes maybe so, you are entitled to your opinion, but can you kindly tell me, the things which i have written in my book are they not also in or from your books?”

They replied in unison,

“Indeed that is correct, whatever you have written and mentioned in your book that is also what is written in our books, however we think it is inappropriate to mention such issues and to excite and fervour the emotions of the people.”

So i replied,

“What do you think we should do then?”

and then i remained silent and began to listen to them attentively.

So they replied with happiness and joy,

“So please burn all of your books and don’t ever publish it again.”

I replied,

“I’m okay with that, but I have one condition.”

They replied,

“But the condition must be something we can fulfill.”

I said,

“Well its very important that this condition is mentioned, I only have this one condition and then we can continue to do as you propose.”

They replied hastily,

“Yes please tell us your condition.”

I said,

“Your (ie shee’ah) books that mention these futile and spurious issues take them out and burn all of them so that we do not have any differences between us and also that no one after me will be able to quote from them like I did. In this way we eliminate the root causes of our problems so when these books don’t exist nor will these issues.”

They pondered for a short while and then said,

“As you very well know these issues are spread throughout the different books and an average person is not able to read them, however you (ie Allaamah Ehsaan) have collated and compiled all of these issues in one book and therefore you want to disunite the Muslims.”

I said,

“Yes, i have collated and compiled all of the beliefs (of the shee’ahs) thereby making it easy and accessible for everyone to read and understand.”

(taken from ash-Sheeah Wa Ahlul Bayt pg.8)

Read Full Post »

In 351Hijree Ma’aza ad-Daulah ie Ahmad bin Buwaiyyah ad-Dailaamee wrote the following statement on the Door of the Grand Mosque of Baghdaad, (we seek refuge in Allaah)

“May the curse of Allah be upon Mu’awiyyah bin Abu Sufyaan, the oppressive who denied Fatima the garden of Fidak, the one who denied Hasan being buried with his grandfather, the one who exiled Abu Dharr and the one who expelled al-Abbaas from the Shoora (council).”

Ma’aza ad-Daulah on the 18th of Dhul-Hijjah 351H announced it to be a day of Eed in Baghdaad and called it the day of ‘Eed Khum Ghadeer’ drums were beaten and there were a lot of festivities.

Controversy persists with regards to choosing this day, some say this day was chosen because on this day the Messenger of Allaah (Sallaalahu Alayhee Wasallam) at his last person near the pond of Khum Ghadeer appointed Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) as his successor however some Shee’ah Raafidhah chose this day as it was the date Uthmaan ibn Affaan (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) was martyred and hence Shee’ah Raafidhah formulated this date as a day of happiness and Eed.

Ma’aza ad-Daulah ie Ahmad bin Buwaiyyah ad-Dailaamee set this up in 351H and since then the Shee’ah Raafidhah have pushed and believe this Eed ie of Ghadeer Khum is more superior and more important than Eed ul-Adha.

In the beginning of 352H Ahmad bin Buwaiyyah ordered the people that on the 10th of Muharram we will mourn the death and martyrdom of Hussain (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) and hence on this day all the shops will be closed and no transactions or business will take place. The people from the towns and villages will wear clothes indicating mourning and will openly lament and grief. The women will have to open their hair, blacken their faces, rip their clothes, walk and parade the streets whilst reciting tragic, sad, depressive, pitiful and lamentable poems and couplets whilst also hitting their faces and chest.

So the Shee’ah Raafidhah did this openly and jubilantly. After all it was the Shee’ah Raafidhah responsible for the deaths of Hussain (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) and his family and hence they had more of a reason to lament as history testifies. Therefore lamenting at their own sin and mistake was not problematic for them and also on the basis that Ubaidullaah ibn Ziyaads army who was the Governor of Koofah was compromised of the same koofee Shee’ah Raafidhah who had invited Hussain (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) to come to koofah and promised their loyalty and their pledge of allegiance. In the same manner they got Muslim ibn Aqeel killed and proved treacherous and liars and hence this is the reason why they mourn, ie because they killed Hussain (RadhiAllaahu Anhu)

Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jama’ah refrained from this and kept themselves away from the Shee’ah Raafidhah as the ministers and local officials were Shee’ah Raafidhah. In the following year 353H the same morning and lamenting was ordered and the Sunnis were instructed to do the same which consequently led to troubles and turmoil between the Sunni and Shee’ahs.

From there on the Shee’ah Raafidhah continued the annual practice of lamenting and mourning and this practice continues today in all the Muslims countries and has even spread to the west as we see often, in Europe, England and USA. In some Muslims countries the Soofee bareilwis mostly bareilwee soofee hanafees are so beguiled that they also join and participate in such mourning and lamenting and follow in the footsteps of the Shee’ah Raafidhah without realising what they are actually doing and so falling prey to the confusion and misguidance of the Shee’ah Raafidhah by their false love and extremism for Hussain (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) and the Prophets Family (May Allaah be pleased with them all) (Refer to Taareekh Islaam 2/566 of Najeebabaadee)

Ma’aza ad-Daulah ie Ahmad bin Buwaiyyah ad-Dailaamee was a bigoted staunch Shee’ah Raafidhah and he and others were ministers in the Abbassid Khaliphate in Baghdaad. Initially he was quiet and observant and later he manifested his true bigotry and extremism in his shee’ism. Many of the Abbaasid ministers and officials were Shee’ah Raafidhah but they were hidden and never openly manifested their beliefs. Ahmad ibn Buwaiyyah intended to crush and weaken the Khaliphate and push the ideology of Raafidhah Shee’ism in Baghdaad which he started in 351H by writing on the doors of the Grand Mosque of Baghdaad,

“May the curse of Allah be upon Mu’awiyyah bin Abu Sufyaan, the oppressive who denied Fatima the garden of Fidak, the one who denied Hasan being buried with his grandfather, the one who exiled Abu Dharr and the one who expelled al-Abbaas from the Shoora (council).”

(Refer to Taareekh Ibn Atheer 8/179)

The Khaliph at the time attempted was unable to halt the spreading of this innovation. The Sunnis would erase the wording from the doors of the mosque but the next day Ahmad bin Buwaiyyah would we-write them. One of Ahmad bin Buwaiyyahs close advisers advised him to add the words, “Mu’awiyyah the oppressor of the Household of Muhammad.” So the cursing and abusing of Mu’awiyyah started and then became the norm.

Ma’aza ad-Daulah ie Ahmad bin Buwaiyyah ad-Dailaamee instigated this further and pushed this concepts vividly throughout Baghdaad and the surrounding areas including villages and other area. He pushed this third Eed and in this way it got incorporated as a permissible muslim festival and a day of joy and happiness.

For 10th Muharram ie Ashoora he forbade all business and the closure of all shops. He ordered the people to wear a specific type of hat and to lament and mourn and for the women to do things we have mentioned previously. He ordered processions through the streets with the people in the processions lamenting and mourning and this is what is continuous to this day. (refer to Taareekh Ibn Atheer 8/184, Taareekh Islaam 4/12-13 of Ma’een ud deen Ahmad)

Over the years these processions increased in their extravagance and extremism, the men started beating themselves with knives and other sharp metal instruments causing bleeding and pain and similarly the women would do the same trying to resemble the women at karbala by opening their hair and dishevelling them, beating their chests and ripping their clothes. They started to wear black clothes as sign of mourning. Without realising this was and is a direct insult and rebuking of the beloved pious household of the Messenger of Allaah (Sallaalahu Alayhee Wasallam), who would never to anything contrary to the teachings of Islaam and the Sunnah.

The Raafidhah Shee’ah allege all of these false things to our Ahlul Bayt, can you imagine Zainab (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) behaving in this way ripping her clothes and beating her chest, crying and lamenting in public. No, you will not find this, rather you will find they were extremely dignified and honourable, patient and in profuse remembrance of Allaah the All mighty as this is what is synonymous with their honour and position, from being from Ahlul Bayt. Yet again this is a sly hidden, deceptive conspiracy of the Raafidhah Shee’ah to secretly discredit the companions and the Ahlul Bayt.

In some instances the Raafidhah Shee’ah don’t change their clothes in these days nor wash believing and wanting to replicate the situation at karbala. They concoct false fabricated stories to make the affair more extravagant and increase the pity on the situation and all of this just to shift their blame from themselves because the Raafidhah Shee’ah know, it was themselves who actually martyred and unlawfully killed Hussain (RadhiAllaahu Anhu). 

Read Full Post »

The shee’ah declare the all the companions to be disbelievers including the household members of the Messenger of Allaah (Sallalaahu Alayhee Wasallam) except 3 companions. Infact the Shee’ah Raafidhah twist this and say all the companions apostated after the demise of the Messenger of Allaah (Sallalaahu Alayhee Wasallam). Furthermore Shee’ah Raafidhah believe it is permissible and they encourage the cursing and abusing of the companions and this has continued from the very beginning.

 

In this day and age when Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jama’ah have expounded and virtue and love of the companions overwhelmingly the Shee’ah Raafidhah have had no choice to manifest their deceptive behaviour and once again change their stance and approach. Now they say they were not disbelievers but inferior in virtue to Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) and hence he had superiority over all companions and should have been the First Caliph.

 

Irrespective of what the Shee’ah Raafidhah say in this day and age it does not hold any value nor will their statements substantiate their beliefs due to them concealing their faith and lying, namely taqiyyah and kithman. Therefore in order to ascertain the beliefs of the Shee’ah Raafidhah it is important to consult and refer to their classical and unilateral works.

 

Kulainee reports from Ja’afar who said, “After the demise of the Messenger of Allaah (Sallalaahu Alayhee Wasallam) everyone apostated except 3 people and he said they were Miqdaad bin al-Aswad, Abu Dharr al-Ghiffaree and Salmaan al-Faarisee.” (Furoo al-Kaafee 69/137-138 of Kulainee)

 

Majlisee reports, “A servant of Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) said to him, “I have served you well for a long time, please tell me about Abu Bakr (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) and Umar (RadhiAllaahu Anhu)? So he replied, “Both of them were Kaafirs (disbelievers) and whoever loves them is also a Kaafir (disbeliever).” (Bahaar al-Anwaar pg.522 of Majlisee)

 

Concerning the verse which mentions “Wa Yanha Anil Fahshaa Wal Munkar Wal-Baghya…” al-Qummee said in his explanation of the Quraan, “Fahshaa refers to Abu Bakr (RadhiAllaahu Anhu), Munkar refers to Umar (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) and baghya refers to Uthmaan (RadhiAllaahu Anhu).” (Tafseer al-Qummee pg.218)

 

Majlisee further said, “There are numerous and plenty of ahadeeth which allude to the kufr (disbelief) of Abu Bakr (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) and Umar (RadhiAllaahu Anhu), they also allude to the innovations they formulated. They also allude to acquiring reward for cursing and abusing them and for also disassociating and shunning them. These ahadeeth number so many that they can be compiled into one or many volumes.” (Bahaar al-Anwaar pg.330)

 

Majlisee says after citing a report that “Abu Bakr (RadhiAllaahu Anhu), Umar (RadhiAllaahu Anhu), Uthmaan (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) and Mu’awiyyah (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) will be in the depths of the hell fire.” (Bahaar al-Anwaar pg.334)

 

The Shee’ah Raafidhah author says, “Oh Allaah have mercy and shower your blessings upon Muhammad (Sallalaahu Alayhee Wasallam) and his Family and curse both (ie Abu Bakr and Umar (RadhiAllaahu Anhuma) the tyrannical idolaters and curse both of his daughters (ie Aishah and Hafsah (RadhiAllaahu Anhuma) except the Quraish.” (Ahqaaq al-Haqq 1/337)

 

Majlisee said in another work, “In the religion of Imaamiyyah (ie the Shee’ah Raafidhah who reject the Caliphate of Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (RadhiAllaahu Anhuma) and adopt The Imamate of Alee and the Imaams) the aspects which are considered to be necessary to believe in are Mut’a (temporary marriage) being halaal (ie lawful) and rejecting and shunning 3 people (ie Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (RadhiAllaahu Anhuma) similarly the same applies to Mu’awiyyah (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) and Yazeed ibn Mu’awiyyah (Rahimahullah) and from every individual who fought against the leader of the believers (ie Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu).” (Risaalah al-Ei’tiqaad pg.58 of Majlisee)

 

The Shee’ah Raafidhah on the day of Ashoora bring a dog which they call umar and they vehemently hit the dog with sticks and stones, until it dies. Then they bring a little goat which they name aishah and they pull its hair right out from the roots and hit it with their shoes and slippers until it also dies. (ASTAGFIRULLAHUl-A’DHEEM) (Tabdeed adh-Dhulaam Wa Tanbiyyah an-Niyaam pg.32)

 

Similarly they celebrate a day of festivities and feasts on the day Umar (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) was martyred and they give an honorary title to the cowardly assassin Abu Lulu al-Majoosee, as Baba Shuja ud deen (The Bold and Brave Saint of the Deen) (al-Kunaa Wa al-Qaab 2/55 of Abbaas al-Ajamee)

 

The simple question we have if the Shee’ah Raafidhah believe Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (RadhiAllaahu Anhuma) apostated, they were hypocrites and innovators (may the curse of Allaah be upon the liars) then why did Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) and his the household name their children Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (RadhiAllaahu Anhuma)?

 

This clearly shows the Shee’ah Raafidhah are liars and they lie and the normal shee’ah masses get engulfed and subjugated with such beliefs without realising the true reality of such issues.

 

Be brave and leave these foolish concepts and know that one day you will die and face Allaah, do not think about what your family and friends will think if you abandon such beliefs and the shee’ah religion rather think what will happen on the day of judgement when Abu Bakr as-Siddeeque, Umar bin al-Khattaab, Uthmaan ibn Affaan and Alee bin Abee Taalib and all of the companions (May Allaah be pleased with all of them) are standing with the Messenger of Allaah (Sallalaahu Alayhee Wasallam) and your asked why were you cursing and abusing my companions?

 

We further ask the Shee’ah Raafidhah since when have they starting naming their children with names that belong to non muslims (according to their incorrect beliefs) its hypocritical and disillusional?

 

It is like the Shee’ah Raafidhah saying we will name our boys as salman rushdie, barack obama, george bush or tony blair or name our women as hirsi ali or amina wudud it does not make sense.

 

So claiming love for the household of the Messenger of Allaah (Sallalaahu Alayhee Wasallam) and at the same time cursing their children and offspring is indeed a great crime and a hidden agenda of the Shee’ah Raafidhah in belittling the companions and the Prophets household. This is clear proof against the Shee’ah Raafidhah who curse Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (RadhiAllaahu Anhuma) whereas the household of the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhee Wasallam) named their children with the same names, this warrants an answer from the Shee’ah Raafidhah

 

The following children of Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) ibn Abee Taalib were martyred (May Allaah be pleased with them all):

Hussain, Ja’afar, Abbaas, Abu Bakr!!!, Muhammad, Uthmaan!!!

 

The following children of Hussain ibn Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) were martyred:

Alee Akbar (some reports his name was Umar), Abdullaah

 

The Following children of Hasan ibn Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) were martyred:

Abdullaah, Qaasim, Abu Bakr!!!

 

The Following children of Aqeel (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) ibn Abe Taalib were martyred:

Ja’afar, Abdullaah, Abdur Rahmaan, Muslim, Abdullaah ibn Muslim

 

The Following children of Abdullaah ibn Ja’afar (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) ibn Abe Taalib were martyred

A’un, Muhammad Ridhwaan (May Allaah be pleased with all of them)     

(refer to Taareekh Khaleefah pg.224 of Ibn Khayaat)

 

Dear readers note why did the household of Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) name their children Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan, it is a point worth noting. This also shows clear enmity and animosity!

Read Full Post »

WHO WAS ABDULLAH IBN SABA?

NEW E-BOOK / NOW AVAILABLE TO DOWNLOAD

PDF>Who Was Abdullah ibn Saba?

QUESTION: Some people deny the existence of Abdullah ibn Saba the jew, I ask you to answer my question in detail in order to clarify the actual reality.

ANSWER: The existence of Abdullah ibn Saba the jew is an actual reality which is established via authentic reports infact these reports are overwhelmingly abundant.

Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jama’ah

(1) Imaam Ahmad bin Zuhair bin Harb

commonly known as Ibn Abee Khaithamah said, “Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) said, “What association do I have with that evil black one ie Abdullah ibn Saba? as he would speak ill of Abu Bakr and Umar (RadhiAllaahu Anhuma).” (Taareekh al-Kabeer of Ibn Abee Khaithamah pg.580 no 1398, its chain is authentic.)

(2) Hujjiyyah al-Kandee

narrates from Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) who said on the minbar, “That black ibn al-Sawda (referring to Ibn Saba) lies on Allaah and his Messenger (Sallalaahu Alayhee Was-Sallam).” (13th Juzz from the Hadeeth of Abu Taahir Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Abdullah bin Nasr adh-Dhuhalee no 157, its chain is authentic, Taareekh Ibn Abee Khaithamah no1398, Taareekh Dimishq 31/6)

(3) Ubaidullaah bin Uthbah (Ibn Masood)

said, “I am not from the Saba’ais nor am I from the Hurroorees.” (the Saba’i ie the one who follows Abdullah ibn Saba the shee’ah and the Hurroorees ie the Khawaarij) (Musannaf Ibn Abee Shaybah 11/299-300 no.31227, no.31761 in another edn. and its chain is authentic)

(4) Imaam Yazeed ibn Zaree’a (d.192H)

said about a narrator, “Mentioned to us (Muhammad ibn Saa’ib) al-Kalbee and he was a Saba’i (a follower of Abdullah ibn Saba ie a sheaa’ah)” (al-Kaamil of Ibn Adiyy 6/2128, its chain is authentic and in another edn 7/275)

(5) Muhammad ibn Saa’ib al-Kalbee

said, “I am a Saba’i” (adh-Dhu’afa of Uqailee 4/77 and its chain is authentic, al-Majrooheen of Ibn Hibbaan 2/253 and its chain is also authentic)

In explanation of who a is Saba’i Imaam Abu Ja’afar al-Uqailee says, “A type of Raafidhah (Rejectors of the 3 Khaliphs) and they are the followers of Abdullah ibn Saba.” (adh-Dhu’afa al-Kabeer of Uqailee 4/77)

(6) Imaam Aamir bin Sharjeel ash-Shu’bah (d.104H)

said, “I have not seen a more stupid group of people than these Saba’is” (al-Kaamil of Ibn Adiyy 6/2128, its chain is authentic and in another edn 7/275)

(7) Imaam Ibn Shihaab az-Zuhree

said concerning a trustworthy narrator whose name was Abdullaah bin Muhammad bin Alee bin Abee Taalib, “As for Abdullaah he was a followers of the Saba’is.” (Taareekh al-Kabeer of Bukhaari 5/187 and its chain is authentic.)

The Saba’is refer to a group from amongst the Raafidhah Shee’ah (Tahdheeb al-Kamaal 10/513)

(8) Haafidh Ibn Hibbaan

said, “As for Kalbee he was a Saba’i and he was from amongst the followers of Abdullah ibn Saba.” (al-Majrooheen 2/253)

(9) Ibraheem ibn Ya’qoob al-Juzjaanee

said, “And they are the Saba’is who disbelieved (ie committed Kufr) and became extremists by claiming Alee was Allaah, except that he (ie Alee) burnt them alive.” (Ahwaal ar-Rijaal pg.37)

(10) Imaam Yahyaa Ibn Ma’een

said concerning a narrator the student of A’amash, Abu Salmaan Yazeed, “He was a Saba’i.” (Taareekh Ibn Ma’een narrated from ad-Dooree no.2870)

And there are numerous statements which establish the reality and existence of Abdullah ibn Saba. The books of Ahlus Sunnah wal-Jama’ah also mention the existence of Abdullah ibn Saba. (for example refer to Taareekh Dimishq of Ibn Asaakir 31/3, Meezaan al-Ei’tidaal 2/426, Leesaan al-Meezaan 3/289, and in another edn 4/22)

Books that have been written on the different sects also mention Abdullah ibn Saba and the Saba’is for example refer to Abul Hasan al-Ash’arees book al-Maqaalaat al-Islaamiyeen pg.86, al-Millal wan-Nihal 2/11 of Sheherastaanee and al-Fisl Wal-Millal Wal-Ahwaa wan-Nihal 4/180 of Ibn Hazm)

Haafidh Ibn Hazm al-Andalloosee said, “They say the Saba’is, the followers of Abdullah ibn Saba al-Humairee al-Yahoodee said something similar about Alee bin Abee Taalib (RadhiAllaahu Anhu)” (al-Fisl Wal-Millal Wal-Ahwaa wan-Nihal 4/180)

Abul Hasan al-Ash’aree said, “From the 14th type of extremism we find is with the Saba’is who are the followers of Abdullah ibn Saba who claim Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) never died and he will return to this world before the day of Judgement.” (al-Maqaalaat al-Islaamiyeen pg.86)

Haafidh Dhahabee said concerning Abdullah ibn Saba, “He was from the extremist heretics and misguided.” (Meezaan al-Ei’tidaal 2/426)

Abdullah ibn Sabas existence is also a reality according to the shee’ash sect themselves and we will present 10 evidences for this.

Shee’ah

(1) Imaam Abu Abdullaah (Ja’afar bin Muhammad bin Alee as-Saadiq)

it is narrated from him that he said, “May the curse of Allaah be upon Abdullah ibn Saba who claimed lordship for Alee, and I swear by Allaah Alee obeyed Allaah, may there be destruction on whoever lies upon us. Verily there will be a group who will say things about us which we do not say about ourselves, we are free from them, we are free from them.” (Rijaal Kashee pg.107 no.172)

The narrators in this chain are trustworthy according to the shee’ah books of narrators and they are all reliable according to them. (Refer to the First Volume of Tanqeeh al-Maqaal)

(2) Hishaam bin Saalim

It is narrated from him who said, “I heard Abu Abdullaah (ie (Ja’afar bin Muhammad bin Alee as-Saadiq) talking about Abdullah ibn Saba and Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) infront of his students about his (ibn Sabas) claim of Lordship for Alee, “Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) asked him to repent but he refused so he burnt alive in the fire.” (Rijaal Kashee pg.107 no.171, with an authentic chain according to the Shee’ahs)

(3) Imaam Kashee

The Imaam of the shee’ah with regards to narrators, “Some of the people of knowledge have mentioned Abdullah ibn Saba was a jew and then accepted Islaam and began to love Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu). He was an extremist when he was a jew and he would say Yousha’a bin Noon was Moosaas (Alayhis Salaam) administrator. When he became a Muslim after the demise of the Messenger of Allaah (sal)he would say something similar about Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu). He was the first person to give fame to the statement to the obligation of Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) to be the Imaam (ie Imaamah), he manifested disallegiance from his (ie Alees) enemies and openly opposed them and declared them to be disbelievers, and this is the reason why those who oppose the shee’ah say the roots of shee’ism and Rraafidhah emanated from judiasm.” (Rijaal Kashee pg.108-109)

(4) Imaam Abu Muhammad Hasan bin Mooswee an-Naubakhtee

Who is from amongst their famous Imaams, said, “The students of Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) and a group of scholars from amongst his followers said Abdullah ibn Saba was a jew and then later accepted Islaam and began to love Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu). When he was a jew he would say such things about Yousha’a bin Noon. After the demise of the Messenger of Allaah (Sallaalahu Alayhee Wasallam) he would say something similar about Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu). He was the first person to give fame to the statement to the obligation of Alee (RadhiAllaahu Anhu) to be the Imaam (ie Imaamah), he manifested disallegiance from his (ie Alees) enemies and openly opposed them, and this is the reason why those who oppose the shee’ah say the roots of Raafidhah emanated from judiasm.” (Firq ash-Shee’ah pg.22 of an-Naubakhtee NOTE this edn was printed with the verification and notes of Sayyid Muhammad Saadiq Aal Bahr al-Uloom from Maktabah Murtadhawiyyah and Matba’a Haidariyyah in Najaf, Iraaq)

(5) Imaam Maaqaanee

This famous Imaam of the shee’ahs says in his book of narrators, “Abdullah ibn Saba is cursed and Alee burnt him.” (Tanqeeh al-Maqaal 1/89 no.6872)

(6) Abu Ja’afar Muhammad bin al-Hasan at-Toosee (d.460)

he wrote, “Abdullah ibn Saba returned back to kufr (disbelief) and showed extremism” (Rijaal at-Toosee pg.51)

(7) Hasan bin Alee bin Dawood al-Hallee

he said, “Abdullah ibn Saba returned to back to kufr and he showed extremism, he calimed prophecy for himself and he used to say Alee was Allaah.” (Kitaab ar-Rijaal 2/254)

(8) – (10)

Refer to al-Maqalaat wal-Firq of Sa’ad bin Abdullah al-Ash’aree al-Qummee pg.21 cited from ash-Shee’ah Wat-Tashee’ah (pg.59) of Ustaadh Ehsaan Elaahee Zaheer Rahimahullah)

Qamoos ar-Rijaal of Tustaree (5/463) cited from ash-Shee’ah Wat-Tashee’ah

Mua’ajam Rijaal al-Hadeeth of Khulaa’ee (10/200) cited from Shee’at of Dr. Muhammad al-Bandaaree pg.56).

Summary

We find the existence and reality of Abdullah ibn Saba the jew is real and established in the reliable books of Ahlus Sunnah and also in the Shee’ah books of narrators and there is no doubt in this. Hence those from amongst the misguided and arch liars from the 14th and 15th century who denying the existence of Abdullah ibn Saba is without any evidence and on basis of this being a lie. it is rejected.

Read Full Post »

Shia shaykh and known writer, Baqir Sharif Qurashi in his book “Life of Imam al-Mahdi”, (Publisher: Ansariyan Publications – Qum First Edition 1427 -2006 – 1385) at the page 241-242 wrote:

In the tradition of Zurarah this same cause is mentioned by the Imam that: “For the Qaim (a.s), there is an occultation before his reappearance.” Zurarah immediately asked, “What for?” Imam replied, “For fear of being murdered.”

Shaykh Tusi says: The cause of the obstacle in the reappearance of Imam Mahdi (a.s) is nothing but the fear of being killed. Because if there had been any other reason, his remaining in occultation would not have been justified.”

Source : Ghaybah, Shaykh Tusi p. 199

So let us check together history.

The Fatimid Caliphate or al-Fātimiyyūn Shi’a caliphate first centered in Tunisia and later in Egypt that ruled over varying areas of the Maghreb, Sicily, Malta,the Levant, and Hijaz from 5 January 909 to 1171. That’s mean they ruled 262 years! No doubt that shia Mahdi would be most welcomed quest in that shia caliphate during these years. But, he didn’t appear.

The Safavids ruled Iran and around countries from 1501 till 1736.  235 years of powerful shia ruling. But 12-th imam still didn’t appear.

Modern Iranian shia state. Since 1979. 31 years. Still we haven’t seen shia Mahdi coming from occultation.

As we seen Tusi said that reason of his going into the ghayba: is nothing but the fear of being killed.

Does that fear still exist?

Read Full Post »

بسم الله

و الصلاة و السلام عَلَى رسول الله

Refuting Shiism and their Shiite Majoos followers regarding the Sahabas (radiallahu anhum) of the Noble Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and exposing their lies and deception.

Continue reading on the link below:

Defending Sahaba and those who were guided, From the lies and attacks of the Rafidhi “misguided”: PART-1

Link : http://alsonnah.wordpress.com/2010/12/17/defending-sahaba-and-those-who-were-guided-from-the-lies-and-attacks-of-the-rafidhi-misguided-part-1/

Defending Sahaba and those who were guided, From the lies and attacks of the Rafidhi “misguided”: PART-2

Link : http://alsonnah.wordpress.com/2010/12/17/defending-sahaba-and-those-who-were-guided-from-the-lies-and-attacks-of-the-rafidhi-%e2%80%9cmisguided%e2%80%9d-part-2/

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: