Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Shia Takfir of Sunnis’ Category

Extreme hatred of Shiism towards the Muslim Ummah.  It is narrated in their books that sparrows should be killed because they are Sunni and they love Abubakr (رضی الله عنه) and Umar (رضی الله عنه). Shiism is the sect of hatred and violence.

Book: Anwar Numania page 211

“It is narrated that sparrow loves fulan (Abubakr) and fulan (Umar) and it is a Sunni. It should be killed in any way possible and executed and then eaten”.

Scan Image:

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

This is a topic for those who have a very good idea about how the Shia function, and they usually function in two groups both having the same goal but the second group is much more dangerous, meaning the likes of Khomeini who has the most evil of beliefs and intentions in his heart but outwardly talks about “Unity” and “Love” between Twelver Shia and Muslims. Sometimes however this “beautiful mask” that hides the vile truth of the shia is exposed by none other than the Shia scholars themselves, and as you know Shiism in its true form can never spread among the Muslims or the non-Muslims and this is one of the main reasons for hiding it.

A Shia has to deceive in order to get under people’s skin, in order to earn their trust and loyalty, then he starts spewing his poison.

The Almighty says in his glorious book: { [Allah praises] those who convey the messages of Allah and fear Him and do not fear anyone but Allah. And sufficient is Allah as Accountant. } [al-Ahzab : 39]

The Shia Imams usually act like they never read the above verse, this is why we find narrations of lies and Taqqiyah constantly attributed to them and by God they are Innocent from this accusation, but this religion has chosen to take the path of lies.

Some Shia scholars as you will see in the following example are too shy to disclose the “message of Allah” and would rather keep it hidden, this is because the “message of Allah” according to their religion is to curse and slander against Abu Bakr (ra) and ‘Umar (ra) and all of their lovers. Shia scholar and Muhaddith Yusuf al-Bahrani was commenting on what the other Shia scholar and Muhaddith Ni’imatullah al-Jazaeri wrote in his book concerning the great Shia Safavid (Safawi) scholar ‘Ali bin al-Hussein al-Karaki, (and it is quoted in Lulu al-Bahrain (p 148):

قال مولانا السيد نعمة الله الجزائري في صدر كتابه شرح غوالي الئالي … وكان رحمه الله لا يركب ولا يمضي إلا والباب يمشي في ركابه مجاهراً بلعن الشيخين ومن على طريقتهما

“Mawlana al-Sayyed Ni’imatullah al-Jazaeri wrote at the beginning of his book Sharh Ghawali al-Laalee … And He (al-Karaki) may Allah have mercy on him never used to ride his horse or walk the streets unless he had his servant walking in front of him cursing the two sheikhs (Abu Bakr & ‘Umar) and cursing those who follow their way

So here we see what the situation was when the Shia were in a position of power and when they had a strong state, al-Karaki used to have people walking with him for the sole purpose of cursing the companions, this is how deep the hatred runs. So al-Bahrani criticizes al-Jazaeri for uncovering the truth of their great scholar because it caused harm to many of the Shia living in Islamic countries, He said:

أقول: إن ما نقله عن الشيخ المزبور من ترك التقية والمجاهرة بسب الشيخين خلاف ما استفاضت به الأخبار عن الأئمة الأخيار الأبرار عليهم السلام ، وهي غفلة من شيخنا المشار إليه إن ثبت النقل المذكور ، وقد نقل السيد المذكور أن علماء الشيعة في مكة المشرفة كتبوا إلى علماء أصفهان من أهل المحاريب والمنابر : أنكم تسبون أئمتهم في أصفهان ونحن في الحرمين نُعذَّب بذلك اللعن والسب ، انتهى ، وهو كذلك

“I say: What he related to us from the sheikh about leaving Taqqiyah and publicly cursing the two sheikhs as opposed to what is found in the countless narrations from the pious Imams (as), this is a mistake from our sheikh if it is proven to be true, and the Sayyed also mentioned that the Shia scholars in Mecca wrote to the Shia scholars of Isfahan saying: { You curse and insult their Imams in Isfahan and we in Mecca and Madinah have to face their wrath. } And this is true.”

Source: Lulu al-Bahrain page 147by Yusuf al-Bahrani.

Since most of the Shia narrations that curse the first three caliphs never do this by stating their name, they instead refer to them as “The first and the second” or “Fulan and Fulan” where the word “Fulan” “فلان” in Arabic is like saying “so-and-so”, for Taqqiyah purposes usually their names aren’t mentioned publicly BUT anyone who is familiar with the Shia religion even the Shia laymen know exactly who is being talked about , I shall provide a sample of this:

The Iranian grand Shia scholar Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi who lived in the Persian Safavid state would discard Taqqiyah and state the obvious as to who “the first and the second” are.

al-Qummi wrote in his Tafseer 2/106: from al-Hassan bin ‘Ali from Salih bin Sa’ad: I heard abu ‘Abdullah (as) explain the saying of Allah:

Surat al-Nur verse 40: {Or (they are) like Darknesses} means Fulan and Fulan, {within an unfathomable sea which is covered by waves} meaning Na’athal, {upon which are waves} meaning Talha and Zubair, {over which are clouds – darknesses, some of them upon others} Mu’awiyah and Yazid and the Fitnah of bani Umayyah, {When one puts out his hand} in the Darkness of their Fitnah, { he can hardly see it. And he to whom Allah has not granted light – for him there is no light.} meaning an Imam from the children of Fatima (as), he doesn’t have the light of an Imam which will guide him on the day of judgement.

al-Majlisi commented on the above narration by his predecessor in Bihar al-Anwar 32/306: What is meant by “Fulan and Fulan” are Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, and “Na’athal” is ‘Uthman , his enemies used to call him Na’athal likening him to a sheikh with long beard in Egypt who used to be an idiot, it also means a male Hyena .”

al-Kulayni narrated in al-Kafi 8/334: Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Qummi from his uncle ‘Abdullah bin al-Salt from Yunus bin ‘Abdul-Rahman from ‘Abdullah bin SInan from Hussein al-Jammal from abu ‘Abdulah (as) regardin the saying of Allah: Surat Fussilat verse 29: {Our Lord, show us those who misled us of the jinn and men [so] we may put them under our feet that they will be among the lowest} He (as) said: It is They, then He (as) said: and Fulan was a devil.

al-Majlisi said in his Bihar al-Anwar 30/270: What is meant by ”Fulan” is ‘Umar . . meaning the Jinn mentioned in the verse is ‘Umar, he used it as reference for him because he was a devil, either because he came from the devil as he was the son of an act of adultery, or because he was a trickster and a deceiver like the devil, and it is possible that “Fulan” here means Abu Bakr.

Many of the Shia scholars did not like their beliefs to be exposed in this way, Grand Ayatulla Muhammad Asif al-Muhsini criticized al-Majlisi for this, because according to him declaring their names would only harm the cause of the Shia and would make the Muslims hate them, al-Muhsini said in Mashara’at Bihar al-Anwar 1/167:

لم يمسك المؤلف رحمه الله قلمه عن السب ، والتفسيق ، والتكفير ، والطعن في جملة من أجزاء بحاره بالنسبة إلى قادة المخالفين ، والله يعلم أنها كم أضرَّت بالطائفة نفساً وعرضاً ومالاً ، على أنه هو الذي نقل الروايات الدالة على وجوب التقية وحرمة إفشاء الأسرار ، وأصرَّ على التصريح بمرجع ضمائر التثنية في الروايات مع أن عوام المؤمنين يعرفونه فضلاً عن خواصهم فأي فائدة في هذا التفسير سوى إشعال نار الغضب والغيض والانتقام ؟ ولا أظنه قادراً على بيان جواب معقول على سلوكه هذا

“The author (al-Majlisi) did not restrain his pen from cursing and insulting and making Takfeer and Tafseeq in his book of Bihar on the leaders of those who differ with us (sunnies), and Allah knows how much this harmed the sect in many ways, it was he who reported the narrations that state that we must hold on to Taqqiyah and that it is forbidden to reveal the secrets, but he insisted on declaring what those pronouns were referring to in the narrations, although the laymen from the believers (shia) know their meaning and so do the scholars, so what benefit can we draw from such explanations other than igniting the flames of anger and revenge? I don’t believe he has a legitimate excuse for what he did.”

– End –

Read Full Post »

SHIITES AND SHIAISM

Shiaism (The Rafidah) and Islam are indeed different religions. This sect has developed into what we now know as the Shia whose beliefs and thoughts are repugnant beyond belief. The divergence of Shiaism from Islaam can be summarized from the books which they consider most authentic, and the statements of their most respected scholars.

Some of the proofs are available on this page Most of the Muslim UMMAH and Western scholars have very little genuine and reliable knowledge of SHIA beliefs and practices. However, most of the openly declared SHIA beliefs revolve around The Concept of Imamah, the superiority of Ali (May Allah be pleased with him), and the so-called love of the Prophet’s family members. As a result, the intense love that Sunni Muslims carry for the Prophet’s family members combined with the magnanimous personality of Ali has led some Sunnis to accept Shia’s as part of the Muslim UMMAH.

However, the brutal fact remains that under the pretense of Ali’s Superiority and the so-called love of the Prophet’s family members, Shias have literally evolved an entirely new religion, grossly distorted the teachings of the Holy Qur’ân, and completely rejected the sanctity and authenticity of the Hadeeth. They have elevated the sayings of their imams to the level of the Prophet’s sayings and have classified them as Hadeeth.

For all practical purposes, they reject the most authentic sayings of the Prophet (Peace be upon him) and base their religion on the so-called Hadeeth attributed to their Imaams. By doing so they have rejected one of the most fundamental principles of Islam: The law can only be derived from the sayings and actions of the Prophet (Peace be upon him), not any other human being.

The Saba’iyyah, a sect of the Rawafid, emerged in the time of `Ali and told `Ali he was God. `Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) burned some of them to death as a result. Later, the Rawafid split into many groups like: The Zaydis, Imamis, Kaysaniyyas, Qaddahiyyas  and Exaggerators (Ghullat). Some people asked Imam Zayd ibn `Ali to disavow Abu Bakr and `Umar. He would not do so, and some people refused his decision, and deserted him, thereby becoming known as Rawafid, which means : the Refusers, the Rejecters.

Those who stayed with him became known as the Zaydis, and so they are technically not of the Rawafid. The exaggerators are not Muslims, these Raafidi (Shia) actually descend from Abu Lu’luah Majoosi (a Persian fire worshipper) and Abdullaah ibn Saba’ (a Jew). However they are more dangerous from the Christians themselves. Christians fight Islaam face to face (if they did) while Rafidiyah stab Islam from its back they have lot of Absurdities in their beliefs like Badah, Rajah, Mutah, Taqiyyah, etc

The Zaydis, Imamis and exaggerators split up further, with each group accusing the other of kufr. The Zaydis split into three groups: Jarudis, Sulaymanis and Butris. They all agreed on the leadership of Imam Zayd ibn `Ali ibn al-Husayn when he revolted at the time of Hisham ibn `Abdul-Malik.

They are the closest of the Shiah to Ahlus-Sunnah; they merely maintain that `Ali had more right to the Caliphate, but they do not claim that he was explicitly appointed as Caliph by the Prophet (may Allah bless him and his Household and grant them peace), and hence they accept the Caliphates of Abu Bakr, `Umar and `Uthman. The Kisanis split into two groups: one claimed that Muhammad ibn Hanafiyyah, a son of `Ali, is still alive and that he is the Mahdi; the other group say he died and passed on the leadership.

The Imamis and exaggerators split into fifteen groups, among which are the Ja`faris/Ithna `Asharis (Twelvers) and the Isma`ilis. The exaggerators claimed divinity for their Imams, permitted all sorts of haram things, and in short dismissed the obligations of shari`ah.

Below we have more then 100 Articles exposing Shia’s using their own books and writings with detailed sources so that they don’t deny it. These references are copied from the religious books of Shiite religion. While translating them we have asked forgiveness of Allah many times, for, these are very much annoying for any Muslim to read. Neither I personally wish anyone to have them but to save the innocent simple Muslims from the Shiites (Raafidah) it was necessary to write them and forward them to our fellow Muslims so that they can know the real terrifying beliefs of Shiites.

Additionally I have also listed some articles about Ismailism and the Agakhanis; one of the more deviant groups within the Shia religion they are an offshoot of the Raafidah (Shiah) and share some of their characteristics. Aga Khan is their supreme leader and, in their view, has characteristics and attributes similar to those of Allaah.

And Lastly The Prophet  said: “Whoever abuses my Companions, upon them is the curse of Allah, the Angles and all the people” (Saheeh, At-Tabaranee)

For those who feel that speaking against this deviant pseudo-Islamic group is waste of time ….First read this then go ahead with other Articles pertaining to Shiite and Shiaism

The historic Khutbah of Sheikh Ali Abd-ur-Rahman al-Hudhaifi, Imaam of Masjid-e-Nabavi

*the Peshawar Nights

Exposing the shiite Al-Tijani Al-Samawi’s Lies in His Book:  “Then I was Guided”

*First: Answering Al-Tijani’s Libels against Abu Hurairah

Second: Answering Al-Tijani in his claim that the four Sunni Imams learned knowledge from Imam Jaffar Al-Saddiq

*Third: Answering Al-Tijani’s allegations against Mu’awiyah bin Abi Sufyan

*Fourth: Al-Tijani’s Allegations against the Mother of Beleivers Ayesha ( may Allah be pleased at her )

*Fifth: Answering Al-Tijani’s Libels against Uthman Ibn Affan

In Defense of Abu Hurairah [Reply to some erroneous claims]

What Do Scholars of the Past and Present say about Shia (Rafidah) ?

Al-Kafi is the MOST reliable Shia Book Al-Kafi was presented to the legendary Imam Qaem who liked it and said: “It suffices our Shi’ites”

How to Approach the Shia Brothers and Sisters A Straight Forward Logic Instead of a Never Ending Debate?

do sHIA HAS DIFFERENT KALIMAH?

Are Shia Kafir?

WHAT IS THE AQEEDAH OF SHIAS?

have seen the terrifying BELIEFS OF SHIITES?

*WHAT ARE The Beliefs of Khomeini the Leader of the Iranian Revolution?

What the Shiites say about AHLUS SUNNAH Muslims?

WHAT ARE THE SHIITES BELIEFS REGARDING ALLAH?

*WHAT ARE THE SHIITES BELIEFS REGARDING PROPHETHOOD?

*WHAT ARE THE SHIITE BELIEFS REGARDING THE COMPANIONS OF THE PROPHET? (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam)

WHAT ARE THE SHIITE BELIEFS ABOUT THE NOBLE MOTHERS OF UMMAH AND WIVES OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD (SAWS)?

WHAT ARE THE SHIITE BELIEFS ABOUT THE FAMILY OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam)?

what are the SHIA BELIEF CONCERNING RAJ’AH?

what are the SHIA BELIEF CONCERNING TAQIYYAH?

what are the SHIA BELIEF CONCERNING Mut’ah?

what are the SHIA BELIEF regarding women?

Who invented the Shia’s sect?  What is the origin of the Shiaism?

racism in Shiite religion

what is the REALITY OF MAATAM?

Who are the Ahlul Bayt?

Who Killed Al-Hussain?

WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE IN KILLING OF KARBALÂ?

Unmasking the other villains of Karbalâ

*THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SHEE’AH AND MUSLIMS WHO FOLLOW THE SUNNAH

Answering-Ansar.org Exposed!

The Role of Zoroastrianism in the Development of Shiism

The similarity between Shia rituals and Christian rituals

IS THIS YOU CALL ISLAAM?

GRAVE WORSHIP

LOOK AT THIS PICTURE

MARTYRDOM

As-Sahabah

*Insincerity of the Shiites

EXCELLENT BOOK WRITTEN BY Ehsaan Elahi Zaheer REGARDING SHIITES TRUE BELIEF, ORIGIN AND HISTORY

The History of the Shia

MEMORANDUM ON AGA KHAN

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE AGAKHANS

THE MYTH OF THE SHIA MAHDI

Who is True Imam Mahdi?

The 12th Imam of the Shiites is the Jewish Anti Christ (Dajjal)

Iran’s Fifty-year Plan to export the revolution and spread Sheism

Shiaism EXPOSITION AND REFUTATION OF SOURCES

An Exposition of the Fallacy of Shiite Beliefs
From Their Own Sources

Absurdities of Ithna Ashari works.

Mistakes of Shiite “Infallibles” in the Shiite sources.

Distortion of Historical Facts

The Shia practice of the forbidden temporary marriage

ya allah 0r ya ali, ya hussain

The Marriage of umm kulthum daughter of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib to ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab

Some Aspects of the Shiite Religion – Be Warned…

The Qur’ân and Imamah

*Quran VS. Shia!

The Plight of Sunni ‘Ulama in Iran

The Dismal Reality of Ahlus Sunnah in Iran

*A time line of Shiite/Raafidah treasons to Islam and crimes against Muslims

*Shiite Belief that the present Quran is fabricated

* Fataawaa of Muslim Scholars on Khomeini

*SHIAS BELIEVE THAT LIKE APOSTLES THE IMAAM TOO WERE NOMINATED BY GOD

Temporary Marriage & Its Illegitimacy in Islam 

Zawaaj Al- Mut’aa

*Whats in the ‘Kashful Asrar’ (book of khomeni)?

The vicious & unscrupulous propaganda of the Shi’ia-1

The vicious & unscrupulous propaganda of the Shi’ia-2

Islam, QADIANISM and Shiaism

Islamic Revolution of Iran??

embassy of the Islaamic republic of iran

Riots in Kermanshah

SHIA!!! BEWARE OF THE SHIITES

*Taqrib – A Study of Attempts at Sunni-Shia
Rapprochement in History

*a scientific dialouge- the tat’heer {purification}
verses & ahaadeeth of kisa’a {veil}

*Fadak Area between Abu Bakr & Fatimah

Concerning The Book ‘Nahjatul Baalighah’

The Creed Of SHIIA

BIO-DATA OF ISMAILI SHIA

The Verse of Tabligh (Conveyance)

THE VERSES OF WILAAYAH

HOW MANY ARE SHIAS altogether?

Is the fast of the ninth and tenth of Muharram recommended?

What  is recommended for the Muslim on the day of ‘Aashooraa.

Alee ibn Abee Talib on the allegations against Abu Bakr and ‘Umar

what these SHIAS don’t know about kHALIFAH ABU BAKR SIDDEEQ RadiAllaahuanhu (632-634 C.E.) “If I were to take a friend other than my Lord, I would take Abu Bakr as a friend.” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shias dont know about kHALIFAH UMAR FAAROOQUERadiAllaahuanhu (634-644 C.E.) “God has placed truth upon Umar’s tongue and heart” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shias don’t know about kHALIFAH UTHMAAN GANI RadiAllaahuanhu (644-656 C.E.) “Every Prophet has an assistant, and my assistant will be Uthmaan.” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shias don’t know about kHALIFAH ALI RadiAllaahuanhu (656-661 C.E.) “You [Ali] are my brother in this world and the next.” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shais don’t know about fatimah Bint MuhammadRadiAllaahuanha

What these shias don’t know about aa’ishah Bint Abu BakrRadi Allahu anha

what these shias don’t know about (abdur-rehmaan) abu Hurairah RadiAllaahuanhu “The kitten man”, literally “The father of a kitten” because like the Prophet he was fond of cats and since his childhood often had a cat to play with.

The Noble Character of Ameer Mu’aawiyah (ra)-The Most Slandered Pious Companion of the Prophet.

The Best Generation

SAHABAH ATTITUDE TOWARDS BID’AH

Virtues of Aboo Bakr As-Siddeeq

Integrity of the Prophet’s Companions

The Path of Ahlus-Sunnah Wal-Jama’ah

the views of ahlus-sunnah towards the Sahâbah

*Are the Sahaba Hypocrites?

Ahl Al-Bait, ‘Ummahat Al-Mu’minin

*A Glimpse at the Way of the Companions Tasfiyah-wat- Tarbiyah

In Defense of Abu Hurairah [Reply to some erroneous claims]

ABANDONING ACTING ON WEAK AHAADEETH EVEN WITH REGARD TO its  EXCELLENT ACTION

Link : http://www.allaahuakbar.in/shiites/index.htm

 

Read Full Post »

Safawi Shia Iran and “Ayatollah” (Khamenei) enjoying to be worshipped and Sunnis to be slandered

Read Full Post »

Hatred and takfir of Shia rafidah towards inhabitants of Makkah and Madinah. From Shia authentic book – al-Kafi.

Muhammad Yaqub al-Kulayni narrated in “al-Kafi” (2/410).

عِدَّةٌ مِنْ أَصْحَابِنَا عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ خَالِدٍ عَنْ عُثْمَانَ بْنِ عِيسَى عَنْ سَمَاعَةَ عَنْ أَبِي بَصِيرٍ عَنْ أَحَدِهِمَا ( عليهما السلام ) قَالَ إِنَّ أَهْلَ مَكَّةَ لَيَكْفُرُونَ بِاللَّهِ جَهْرَةً وَ إِنَّ أَهْلَ الْمَدِينَةِ أَخْبَثُ مِنْ أَهْلِ مَكَّةَ أَخْبَثُ مِنْهُمْ سَبْعِينَ ضِعْفاً .

From one of them (either Abu Jafar or Abu Abdullah):  “Inhabitants of Makkah openly disbelieved in Allah, and inhabitants of Madinah worse than them, worse from them 70 weak (or they –  inhabitants of Madinah –  70 times worse than them).”

Majlisi said Hadith Muwathaq.

Read Full Post »

Hatred and Takfir of Shia Rafidah scholars and their majoos followers towards Sahabahs (Companions – ra) are well known and recorded in their own books, writings and fatawas.

How could Sunnis consider Shia Muslim and their brother in faith while the opposite are very clear that they hated and consider the Sahabahs (ra) and all Sunnis (Muslims) KUFFAR (Disbelievers)?!

Ya Sunnis (Muslims)… wake up and realized that Shias are the enemies of Muslims and Islam!!!

Dont be fooled by their soft spoken words. They just make Taqiyyah in order to fool Muslims and convert them into their creed of Bid’ah and Kufr.

Wa iyaudhubillah!

See and read below how they viewed the noble Sahabahs (ra).

Taken from commentary of shia scholar Ayashi, narration #148:

From Khannan ibn Sadeer from his father from Abu Jafar (alaihi salam): “People became apostates after (death of) Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam).”

And I said: “Who are these three?”

He said: “al-Miqdad, Abu Dharr and Salman al-Farese”…


In “Kitab Sulaym ibn Qays” it is written:

Ali (alayhi salam) said: “All people apostated after prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) except 4 of them.”

 

Al-Kulayni says in Rawdhatul Kaafi Vol.8  pg. 235, and Majlisi in “Mirat” said it’s hasan or muwathaq:

‘People became apostates after the death of the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam), except for three people: Miqdad ibn Aswad, Abu Dharr Ghifari and Salmaan Farsi.’

Read Full Post »

The greatest of the doctrines of the Raafidah is that of “Imaamah”, believing that Ali was the only rightful leader after the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and as such, their theology is founded entirely around this concept.

Hence, their understanding of the foundations of Islaam (tawhid, belief, obedience) and what opposes them (shirk, disbelief,disobdience) are different to what is well known to the Muslims at large. Here we look at their understanding of Shirk (polytheism).

Tafsir of Furat bin Ibrahim al-Kufi: The Understanding of Shirk:

This is one of the major Shia books of Tafsir (Iran, 2nd edition, 1416H), and there occurs therein (p. 370), “If you commit Shirk, you actions will be futile” Furat said: Ja’far bin Muhammad al-Fazaaree said, with an’ana (a type of narrating of reports which does not state direct hearing): From Abi Ja’far (alayhis salaam), regarding His, the Most High’s saying, “If you commit Shirk, you actions will be futile” (39:65), he said: If you commit Shirk with the wilaayah (leadership) of Ali, your actions will be futile.

Built upon this notion, all of Ahl al-Sunnah are considered Mushriks (pagans), because according to Shias, Ahl al-Sunnah deny Ali the right of wilaayah (leadership) after Muhammad (alayhis salaam) and give it to the three Caliphs, Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhum) before Ali (radiallaahu anhu).
 
This conception helps us to also understand the belief and attitude of the Shia towards all non-Shia (Ahl al-Sunnah) that they are the offspring of prostitutes, and whose parents’ marriages, whilst considered legitimate on the surface, will be invalidated when their alleged Mahdi arrives, at which time, all the marriages of Ahl al-Sunnah will be legislatively invalidated and they and their children will be free game for murder, rampage, enslavement and war-booty.
 
As for the true meaning of Shirk, it is to direct worship (which takes place in the heart, on the tongue and on the limbs) to other than Allaah, and this is what the Prophets and Messengers came to warn against, and they explained it is a violation and invalidation of one’s claim of belief in a sole creator, provider, owner, master – since the two are binding and necessary to each other, if one believes in lordship for Allaah alone, it necessitates directing worship only to Him alone – and this is the monotheism in all revealed books and sent messengers.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: