Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Tahrif (Distortion) of Quraan’ Category

The original narration is this:

« عَلِی بْنُ الْحَكَمِ عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ سَالِمٍ عَنْ أَبِی عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع قَالَ: إِنَّ الْقُرْآنَ الَّذِی جَاءَ بِهِ جَبْرَئِیلُ ع إِلَى مُحَمَّدٍ ص سَبْعَةَ عَشَرَ أَلْفَ آیة» (الكافی، ج‏2، ص: 634، دار الکتب اسلامیه _تهران،ط4)

Imam Jafar (as) said: “The Quran that Gibrael (as) brought to Muhammad (saw) had 17,000 verses”.

According to Majlisi the narration is Authentic:(مرآة العقول، ج‏12، ص: 525، مجلسی ؛ دار الکتب اسلامیه_تهران،ط2)

Majlisi says about this narration:

«الحدیث الثامن و العشرون‏: موثق. و فی بعض النسخ عن هشام بن سالم موضع هارون بن مسلم، فالخبر صحیح و لا یخفى أن هذا الخبر و كثیر من الأخبار الصحیحة صریحة فی نقص القرآن و تغییره، و عندی أن الأخبار فی هذا الباب متواترة معنى، و طرح جمیعها یوجب رفع الاعتماد عن الأخبار رأسا بل ظنی أن الأخبار فی هذا الباب لا یقصر عن أخبار الإمامة فكیف یثبتونها بالخبر.» (مرآة العقول، ج‏12، ص: 525، مجلسی ؛ دار الکتب اسلامیه_تهران،ط2)

Help needed in correcting the translation:

Hadith 28: It is Authentic. In some copies Harun bin Muslim is mentioned instead of Hisham bin Salim.Therefore, this narration is Authentic. It is not hidden that this narration and most of these Authentic narrations are clear about corruption and alteration of Quran. In my view the narrations of Tahreef of Quran are Mutawatir and throwing all these narrations makes the Hadith system unreliable rather I think that narrations of Tahreef are not less than the narrations of Imamate [thus if not accepting the narrations of Tahreef] how are they going to prove Imamate from narrations?

So the narrations of Tahreef of Quran are not only Mutawatir but they are also not less than the narrations of Imamate.

Now the altered one: In this version they replaced 17000 with 7000. Published by Darul Hadis Qum.

They replaced سَبْعَةَ عَشَرَ أَلْفَ آیة with سبعة آلاف آیة .

«عَلِی بْنُ الْحَكَمِ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ سَالِمٍ‏:عَنْ أَبِی عَبْدِ اللَّهِ علیه السلام، قَالَ: «إِنَّ الْقُرْآنَ الَّذِی جَاءَ بِهِ جَبْرَئِیلُ علیه السلام إِلى‏ مُحَمَّدٍ صلى الله علیه و آله‏ سَبْعَةَ آلَافِ‏ آیةٍ». (الكافی، ج‏4، ص: 675، دار الحدیث _قم،ط1)

Scan:

Original Article in Farsi

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Faydh al-Kashani in “Tafsir as-Safi” (4/209), and Huwayzi in “Noor as-Saqalayn” (4/233):

 في ثواب الأعمال والمجمع عن الصادق عليه السلام من كان كثير القراءة لسورة الأحزاب كان يوم القيامة في جوار محمد صلى الله عليه وآله وأزواجه وزاد في ثواب الأعمال ثم قال سورة الأحزاب فضحت نساء قريش من العرب وكانت أطول من سورة البقرة ولكن نقصوها وحرفوها

In Thawabul Amal (of Shaykh Saduq) and al-Majmua from Sadiq (alaihi salam): Who would read a lot Surah al-Ahzab, in the doomsday he would be in the vicinity of Muhammad (sallalahu alaihi wa ali) and his wives, and in Thawabul Amal addition: then he said: “Surah al-Ahzab exposed women of Quraish from Arabs, and IT WAS LONGER THAN SURAH AL-BAQARAH, BUT (IT WAS) SHORTENED AND CORRUPTED.”

Tafsir as-Safi:

Noor as-Saqalayn:

Biharul Anwar (89/288):

Read Full Post »

The grand Shia scholar al-Mirza Habibullah al-Khoei in his famous sharh called “Minhaj al-Bara’ah fi Sharh Nahjul Balagha” discusses the corruption of the Quran. This isn’t the same al-Khoei, author of Mu`jam Rijaal al-Hadeeth. This is Habib Allaah al-Khoei who was born in the year 1261 or 1268 and died in the year 1324.

He is buried in the Ra’y in the shrine of `Abd al-`Adheem al-Hussayni. Minhaaj al-Baraa`ah fee SharH Nahj al-Balaaghah (منهاج البراعة في شرح نهج البلاغة) is one of his many books. His book is actually one of more famous commentaries of Nahj al-Balaaghah

I will quote from his book, firstly he starts by stating many examples of Shia Hadiths on Tahreef:

Then he says on pages 219 to 221:

و الانصاف أنّ القول بعدم النّقص فيه ممّا يمكن إنكاره بعد ملاحظة الأدلة و الأخبار التي قدّمناها ، فانّها قد بلغت حدّ التّواتر ، مضافا إلى أخبار ورود الامة على الحوض و قولهم بعد سؤال النّبيّ صلّى اللّه عليه و آله عنهم كيف خلّفتموني في الثقلين : أمّا الأكبر فحرقناه ( فبدلناه خ ل ) و أمّا الأصغر فقتلناه ، و هذه الأخبار أيضا متواترة ، و مع التّنزل عن بلوغها حدّ التواتر نقول : إنّه بانضمامها إلى الأخبار الاول لا محالة تكون متواترة مفيدة للعلم بثبوت النّقصان، إذ لو كان القرآن الموجود بأيدينا اليوم بعينه القرآن المنزل من السّماء من دون أن يكون فيه تحريف و نقصان ، فأىّ داع كان لهم على الطبخ و الاحراق الذي صار من أعظم المطاعن عليهم .
فان قلت : إذا ثبت وقوع التّغيير في القرآن فكيف يجوز لنا قرائته ؟ بل اللازم قرائته على نحو ما انزل فيما اطلعنا عليه .
قلت : إنّ الأئمة عليهم السلام رخّصونا على ما هو الموجود الآن و لم يأذنوا بقرائته على نحو ما انزل .
يدلّ على ذلك ما رواه في الكافي مرسلا عن سهل بن زياد عن محمّد بن سليمان عن بعض أصحابه عن أبي الحسن عليه السّلام قال : قلت له : جعلت فداك إنا نسمع الآيات في القرآن ليس هي عندنا كما نسمعها و لا نحسن أن نقرأها كما بلغنا عنكم فهل نأثم ؟
فقال عليه السّلام : لا ، اقرءوا كما تعلّمتم فسيجيئكم من يعلّمكم .
و فيه أيضا باسناده إلى سالم بن سلمة ، قال : قرء رجل على أبي عبد اللّه عليه السّلام و أنا أستمع حروفا من القرآن ليس على ما يقرئها النّاس ، فقال أبو عبد اللّه عليه السّلام :
مه كفّ عن هذه القرائة و اقرء كما يقرء النّاس حتّى يقوم القائم عليه السّلام : فاذا قام قرء كتاب اللّه على حدّه و أخرج المصحف الذي كتبه عليّ عليه السّلام .
فان قلت : سلّمنا وجود التّحريف فيه فلم لم يصحّحه أمير المؤمنين عليه السّلام حيثما جلس على سرير الخلافة مع أنّه لم يكن منه مانع يومئذ .
قلت : إنّه عليه السّلام لم يتمكن منه لوجود التقية المانعة من حيث كونه مستلزما
[ 220 ]
للتشنيع على من سبقه كما لم يتمكن من إبطال صلاة الضحى ، و من إجراء متعتي الحجّ و النّساء ، و من عزل شريح عن القضاوة ، و معاوية عن الامارة ، و قد صرّح بذلك في رواية الاحتجاج السّابقة في مكالمته عليه السّلام مع الزّنديق .
مضافا إلى اشتمال عدم التّصحيح على مصلحة لا تخفى ، و هو أن يتمّ الحجة في يوم القيامة على المحرّفين المغيّرين من هذه الجهة أيضا بحيث يظهر شناعة فعلهم لجميع أهل المحشر ، و ذلك بأن يصدر الخطاب من مصدر الرّبوبيّة إلى امّة محمّد صلّى اللّه عليه و آله ، و يقال لهم : كيف قرأتم كتابي الذي أنزلته إليكم ؟ فيصدر عنهم الجواب ،
بأنّا قرأناه كذا و كذا ، فيقال لهم : ما أنزلناه هكذا فلم ضيّعتموه و حرّفتموه و نقصتموه ؟
فيجيبوا أن يا ربّنا ما قصّرنا فيه و لا ضيّعناه و لا فرطنا ، بل هكذا وصل إلينا .
فيخاطب حملة الوحى و يقال لهم : أنتم قصّرتم في تبليغ وحيي و أداء أمانتي ؟ فيقولوا ربّنا ما فرطنا في وحيك من شي ء و إنّما فرط فيه فلان و فلان بعد مضيّ نبيّهم ،
فيظهر شناعه فعلهم و فضاحة عملهم لجميع أهل المحشر و يستحقّوا بذلك الخزى العظيم و العذاب الأليم مضافا إلى استحقاقهم للنّكال و العقاب بتفريطهم في أمر الرّسالة و تقصيرهم في غصب الخلافة .
فان قلت : سلّمنا أنّ عليّا عليه السّلام لم يتمكن من تصحيحه و أنّ بقائه على التّحريف كان مشتملا على المصلحة التي ذكرتها ، و لكن بقي هنا شي‏ء و هو أنّ الأئمة لم لم يدفعوا ما عندهم من الكتاب المنظم المحفوظ السّالم عن التّحريف إلى الامّة و ما كان المانع لهم من ذلك ؟
قلت : السّر في عدم إظهارهم عليهم السلام له وجوه كثيرة :
منها أنّه لو أظهر ذلك الكتاب مع بقاء هذا الكتاب المحرّف لوقع الاختلاف بين النّاس و يكون ذلك سببا لرجوع النّاس إلى كفرهم الأصلي و أعقابهم القهقرى .
و منها أنّ شوكة النّفاق يومئذ كان أكثر فلو أظهروه لأحدث المنافقون فيه مثل ما أحدثه رئيسهم قبلهم .
[ 221 ]
و منها أنّه مع إظهاره أيضا لا يكون له رواج ، لمكان شهرة ذلك المحرّف إلى غير هذه من الأسرار التي تستفاد من الأخبار .
و كيف كان فقد ظهر و تحقّق ممّا ذكرنا كله أنّ حدوث التّحريف و النّقصان في القرآن ممّا لا غبار عليه .
و أمّا الزّيادة ففيها تردّد و الأقوى العدم إذ الدّليل عليها ليس إلاّ عدّة روايات و هي لا تقاوم الاجماعات التي ادّعاها الشّيخ و الصّدوق و الطبرسي و المحقّق الكاظمي

Translation:

[page 219]

To be fair, the denial of corruption in terms of deletion can be countered by the proofs and narrations that we stated earlier and they have reached the level of Tawatur, also by adding the narrations of when the nation will be brought to the fountain(Hawd) and they will say after the Prophet SAWS asks them on what they did with the two weighty things: “As for the bigger one we burned/changed it, as for the smaller one we killed them.” and these narrations are also Mutawatir, even if we were to say that doesn’t reach Tawatur yet by adding them to the previous narrations they become Mutawatir and they would clearly prove the deletion from the Quran.
If the Quran in our hands today was the exact same as the one that was revealed from the sky without corruption or deletion, then I ask: for what purpose would they mess with it and burn it? by doing so this has become the biggest criticism against them.
You would say: “If this Quran was indeed corrupt, then how can it be permissible for us to read it? it is required that we read it the way it was revealed.”
I say: The Imams permitted us to read what is present in our hands and they did not permit us to read it the way it was revealed, one of the proofs for this is what is narrated in the Mursal hadith in al-Kafi from Sahl bin Ziad from Muhammad bin Suleiman from some of his companions from Abu al-Hassan (as) that he asked him: “May I be a sacrifice for you, we hear the verses from the Quran unlike the ones we have, and we are not able to read them in the form that reached us from you(Imams), are we sinful?”
He (as) replied: “No, recite it as you have been taught. there shall come one who shall teach you.”
And in it also is with the Isnad to Salim bin Salamah: “A man recited to abu ‘Abdullah (as) and I heard words unlike those read by the people.” He (as) told the man: “Men! stop this recitation and recite it like the rest of the people until al-Qaem rises. When he does he shall revealed the true Quran written by ‘Ali.”
If you say: “We agree with you that it is corrupt, so why didn’t Ameer al-Mumineen (as) correct it? was he not the Caliph and there was no one to stop him?”

[page 220]

I say: “He (as) did not do this for the purpose of Taqqiyah, because doing so will make the first three look horrible. He also could not abolish the prayer of Duha, and was not able to establish the Mutah of Hajj and the Mutah of women. He was not able to remove Shurayh from position of Judge nor Mu’awiyah from position of Ameer…”

[Then al-Mirza says after a couple of lines]

I say: “The reason why they (as) did not reveal it is based on many points.
from them: If that book was revealed while this corrupt one was present, then there would be difference among the people and they may return to their previous state of Kufr.
from them: the hypocrites were extremely dominant at the time so if they revealed it then the hypocrites would have changed it like their leaders before them did.

[page 221]

from them: if it was revealed it wouldn’t spread much because of the popularity of the corrupted one, and there are many other reasons.
And no matter what the case, it is apparent and proven from all we have stated that there is no dust on the fact that the Quran is corrupted in terms of deletion.
As for the saying of corruption in terms of addition then this is not a strong opinion and is only based on a few narrations that cannot counter the consensus stated by al-Sheikh and al-Saduq and al-Tabrasi and al-Muhaqqiq al-Kathimi.”

Source: Minhaj al-Bara’ah fi Sharh Nahjul Balagha “منهاج البراعة في شرح نهج البلاغة” by al-Mirza Habibullah al-Khoei, al-Wafaa Beirut Lebanon, volume 2, pages 216 to 220.

Read Full Post »

We are going again to quote famous Shia Scholar Abul Hasan Amili in response to those shias who don’t believe in Tahrif.

He said:

And who rejected that (tahrif) show as a proof verses: “and most surely ” (41:41) it is a Mighty Book: (42) Falsehood shall not come to it from before it nor from behind it; a revelation from the Wise, the Praised One”, and “(15:9) Surely We have revealed the Reminder and We will most surely be its guardian.”

It could be said in answer: “After we would accept that verses are proof for their aims, it’s apparent from we have explained, the complete real Quran as it was revealed by Allah, protected (one is) with imam, and he inherited it from Ali (alaihi salam)…”


Read Full Post »

Shia scholar Abul Hasan al-Alami said:

“It should be known, as it apparent from words of  siqatul Islam Muhammad ibn Yaqub al-Kulayni, (he) did believe in tahrif in Qur’aan and omission. Because he gave a lot of place to Ahadeeth about that in his book “al-Kafi”. He expressed that he believe in ahadeth that he narrated in the beginning of his book…….  And is the same way (acted) his sheikh Ali ibn Ibrahim al-Qummi.”

Quoted from “Muqadimatu Tafsir al-Burhan”

Scan pages:

Read Full Post »

Book: “Masabihul-Anwar fi Hali Mushkilatil Ahbar” vol 2, p 295, Muasasat Alami, Beirut

Author: Ayatollah Abdullah Shubbar

 Ayatollah Abdullah Shubbar said:

ويمكن رفع التنافي بالنسبة إلى الأوّل: بأنّ القرآن الذي أُنزل على النبي صلّى اللّه عليه وآله وسلّم أكثر ممّا في أيدينا اليوم وقد أُسقط منه شيء كثير، كما دلّت عليه الأخبار المتظافرة التي كادت أن تكون متواترة

“As for the first one, variance could be raised in this way: Quran which was revealed upon messenger (sallalahu alaihi wa alihi wa sallam) is more than we have on our hands in this day. In accordance to countless narrations which are near level of tawatur, many things were omitted from it”.

Attached scan image of the book “Masabihul-Anwar fi Hali Mushkilatil Ahbar”

Read Full Post »

SHIITES AND SHIAISM

Shiaism (The Rafidah) and Islam are indeed different religions. This sect has developed into what we now know as the Shia whose beliefs and thoughts are repugnant beyond belief. The divergence of Shiaism from Islaam can be summarized from the books which they consider most authentic, and the statements of their most respected scholars.

Some of the proofs are available on this page Most of the Muslim UMMAH and Western scholars have very little genuine and reliable knowledge of SHIA beliefs and practices. However, most of the openly declared SHIA beliefs revolve around The Concept of Imamah, the superiority of Ali (May Allah be pleased with him), and the so-called love of the Prophet’s family members. As a result, the intense love that Sunni Muslims carry for the Prophet’s family members combined with the magnanimous personality of Ali has led some Sunnis to accept Shia’s as part of the Muslim UMMAH.

However, the brutal fact remains that under the pretense of Ali’s Superiority and the so-called love of the Prophet’s family members, Shias have literally evolved an entirely new religion, grossly distorted the teachings of the Holy Qur’ân, and completely rejected the sanctity and authenticity of the Hadeeth. They have elevated the sayings of their imams to the level of the Prophet’s sayings and have classified them as Hadeeth.

For all practical purposes, they reject the most authentic sayings of the Prophet (Peace be upon him) and base their religion on the so-called Hadeeth attributed to their Imaams. By doing so they have rejected one of the most fundamental principles of Islam: The law can only be derived from the sayings and actions of the Prophet (Peace be upon him), not any other human being.

The Saba’iyyah, a sect of the Rawafid, emerged in the time of `Ali and told `Ali he was God. `Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) burned some of them to death as a result. Later, the Rawafid split into many groups like: The Zaydis, Imamis, Kaysaniyyas, Qaddahiyyas  and Exaggerators (Ghullat). Some people asked Imam Zayd ibn `Ali to disavow Abu Bakr and `Umar. He would not do so, and some people refused his decision, and deserted him, thereby becoming known as Rawafid, which means : the Refusers, the Rejecters.

Those who stayed with him became known as the Zaydis, and so they are technically not of the Rawafid. The exaggerators are not Muslims, these Raafidi (Shia) actually descend from Abu Lu’luah Majoosi (a Persian fire worshipper) and Abdullaah ibn Saba’ (a Jew). However they are more dangerous from the Christians themselves. Christians fight Islaam face to face (if they did) while Rafidiyah stab Islam from its back they have lot of Absurdities in their beliefs like Badah, Rajah, Mutah, Taqiyyah, etc

The Zaydis, Imamis and exaggerators split up further, with each group accusing the other of kufr. The Zaydis split into three groups: Jarudis, Sulaymanis and Butris. They all agreed on the leadership of Imam Zayd ibn `Ali ibn al-Husayn when he revolted at the time of Hisham ibn `Abdul-Malik.

They are the closest of the Shiah to Ahlus-Sunnah; they merely maintain that `Ali had more right to the Caliphate, but they do not claim that he was explicitly appointed as Caliph by the Prophet (may Allah bless him and his Household and grant them peace), and hence they accept the Caliphates of Abu Bakr, `Umar and `Uthman. The Kisanis split into two groups: one claimed that Muhammad ibn Hanafiyyah, a son of `Ali, is still alive and that he is the Mahdi; the other group say he died and passed on the leadership.

The Imamis and exaggerators split into fifteen groups, among which are the Ja`faris/Ithna `Asharis (Twelvers) and the Isma`ilis. The exaggerators claimed divinity for their Imams, permitted all sorts of haram things, and in short dismissed the obligations of shari`ah.

Below we have more then 100 Articles exposing Shia’s using their own books and writings with detailed sources so that they don’t deny it. These references are copied from the religious books of Shiite religion. While translating them we have asked forgiveness of Allah many times, for, these are very much annoying for any Muslim to read. Neither I personally wish anyone to have them but to save the innocent simple Muslims from the Shiites (Raafidah) it was necessary to write them and forward them to our fellow Muslims so that they can know the real terrifying beliefs of Shiites.

Additionally I have also listed some articles about Ismailism and the Agakhanis; one of the more deviant groups within the Shia religion they are an offshoot of the Raafidah (Shiah) and share some of their characteristics. Aga Khan is their supreme leader and, in their view, has characteristics and attributes similar to those of Allaah.

And Lastly The Prophet  said: “Whoever abuses my Companions, upon them is the curse of Allah, the Angles and all the people” (Saheeh, At-Tabaranee)

For those who feel that speaking against this deviant pseudo-Islamic group is waste of time ….First read this then go ahead with other Articles pertaining to Shiite and Shiaism

The historic Khutbah of Sheikh Ali Abd-ur-Rahman al-Hudhaifi, Imaam of Masjid-e-Nabavi

*the Peshawar Nights

Exposing the shiite Al-Tijani Al-Samawi’s Lies in His Book:  “Then I was Guided”

*First: Answering Al-Tijani’s Libels against Abu Hurairah

Second: Answering Al-Tijani in his claim that the four Sunni Imams learned knowledge from Imam Jaffar Al-Saddiq

*Third: Answering Al-Tijani’s allegations against Mu’awiyah bin Abi Sufyan

*Fourth: Al-Tijani’s Allegations against the Mother of Beleivers Ayesha ( may Allah be pleased at her )

*Fifth: Answering Al-Tijani’s Libels against Uthman Ibn Affan

In Defense of Abu Hurairah [Reply to some erroneous claims]

What Do Scholars of the Past and Present say about Shia (Rafidah) ?

Al-Kafi is the MOST reliable Shia Book Al-Kafi was presented to the legendary Imam Qaem who liked it and said: “It suffices our Shi’ites”

How to Approach the Shia Brothers and Sisters A Straight Forward Logic Instead of a Never Ending Debate?

do sHIA HAS DIFFERENT KALIMAH?

Are Shia Kafir?

WHAT IS THE AQEEDAH OF SHIAS?

have seen the terrifying BELIEFS OF SHIITES?

*WHAT ARE The Beliefs of Khomeini the Leader of the Iranian Revolution?

What the Shiites say about AHLUS SUNNAH Muslims?

WHAT ARE THE SHIITES BELIEFS REGARDING ALLAH?

*WHAT ARE THE SHIITES BELIEFS REGARDING PROPHETHOOD?

*WHAT ARE THE SHIITE BELIEFS REGARDING THE COMPANIONS OF THE PROPHET? (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam)

WHAT ARE THE SHIITE BELIEFS ABOUT THE NOBLE MOTHERS OF UMMAH AND WIVES OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD (SAWS)?

WHAT ARE THE SHIITE BELIEFS ABOUT THE FAMILY OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam)?

what are the SHIA BELIEF CONCERNING RAJ’AH?

what are the SHIA BELIEF CONCERNING TAQIYYAH?

what are the SHIA BELIEF CONCERNING Mut’ah?

what are the SHIA BELIEF regarding women?

Who invented the Shia’s sect?  What is the origin of the Shiaism?

racism in Shiite religion

what is the REALITY OF MAATAM?

Who are the Ahlul Bayt?

Who Killed Al-Hussain?

WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE IN KILLING OF KARBALÂ?

Unmasking the other villains of Karbalâ

*THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SHEE’AH AND MUSLIMS WHO FOLLOW THE SUNNAH

Answering-Ansar.org Exposed!

The Role of Zoroastrianism in the Development of Shiism

The similarity between Shia rituals and Christian rituals

IS THIS YOU CALL ISLAAM?

GRAVE WORSHIP

LOOK AT THIS PICTURE

MARTYRDOM

As-Sahabah

*Insincerity of the Shiites

EXCELLENT BOOK WRITTEN BY Ehsaan Elahi Zaheer REGARDING SHIITES TRUE BELIEF, ORIGIN AND HISTORY

The History of the Shia

MEMORANDUM ON AGA KHAN

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE AGAKHANS

THE MYTH OF THE SHIA MAHDI

Who is True Imam Mahdi?

The 12th Imam of the Shiites is the Jewish Anti Christ (Dajjal)

Iran’s Fifty-year Plan to export the revolution and spread Sheism

Shiaism EXPOSITION AND REFUTATION OF SOURCES

An Exposition of the Fallacy of Shiite Beliefs
From Their Own Sources

Absurdities of Ithna Ashari works.

Mistakes of Shiite “Infallibles” in the Shiite sources.

Distortion of Historical Facts

The Shia practice of the forbidden temporary marriage

ya allah 0r ya ali, ya hussain

The Marriage of umm kulthum daughter of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib to ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab

Some Aspects of the Shiite Religion – Be Warned…

The Qur’ân and Imamah

*Quran VS. Shia!

The Plight of Sunni ‘Ulama in Iran

The Dismal Reality of Ahlus Sunnah in Iran

*A time line of Shiite/Raafidah treasons to Islam and crimes against Muslims

*Shiite Belief that the present Quran is fabricated

* Fataawaa of Muslim Scholars on Khomeini

*SHIAS BELIEVE THAT LIKE APOSTLES THE IMAAM TOO WERE NOMINATED BY GOD

Temporary Marriage & Its Illegitimacy in Islam 

Zawaaj Al- Mut’aa

*Whats in the ‘Kashful Asrar’ (book of khomeni)?

The vicious & unscrupulous propaganda of the Shi’ia-1

The vicious & unscrupulous propaganda of the Shi’ia-2

Islam, QADIANISM and Shiaism

Islamic Revolution of Iran??

embassy of the Islaamic republic of iran

Riots in Kermanshah

SHIA!!! BEWARE OF THE SHIITES

*Taqrib – A Study of Attempts at Sunni-Shia
Rapprochement in History

*a scientific dialouge- the tat’heer {purification}
verses & ahaadeeth of kisa’a {veil}

*Fadak Area between Abu Bakr & Fatimah

Concerning The Book ‘Nahjatul Baalighah’

The Creed Of SHIIA

BIO-DATA OF ISMAILI SHIA

The Verse of Tabligh (Conveyance)

THE VERSES OF WILAAYAH

HOW MANY ARE SHIAS altogether?

Is the fast of the ninth and tenth of Muharram recommended?

What  is recommended for the Muslim on the day of ‘Aashooraa.

Alee ibn Abee Talib on the allegations against Abu Bakr and ‘Umar

what these SHIAS don’t know about kHALIFAH ABU BAKR SIDDEEQ RadiAllaahuanhu (632-634 C.E.) “If I were to take a friend other than my Lord, I would take Abu Bakr as a friend.” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shias dont know about kHALIFAH UMAR FAAROOQUERadiAllaahuanhu (634-644 C.E.) “God has placed truth upon Umar’s tongue and heart” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shias don’t know about kHALIFAH UTHMAAN GANI RadiAllaahuanhu (644-656 C.E.) “Every Prophet has an assistant, and my assistant will be Uthmaan.” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shias don’t know about kHALIFAH ALI RadiAllaahuanhu (656-661 C.E.) “You [Ali] are my brother in this world and the next.” (Prophet’s Statement)

what these shais don’t know about fatimah Bint MuhammadRadiAllaahuanha

What these shias don’t know about aa’ishah Bint Abu BakrRadi Allahu anha

what these shias don’t know about (abdur-rehmaan) abu Hurairah RadiAllaahuanhu “The kitten man”, literally “The father of a kitten” because like the Prophet he was fond of cats and since his childhood often had a cat to play with.

The Noble Character of Ameer Mu’aawiyah (ra)-The Most Slandered Pious Companion of the Prophet.

The Best Generation

SAHABAH ATTITUDE TOWARDS BID’AH

Virtues of Aboo Bakr As-Siddeeq

Integrity of the Prophet’s Companions

The Path of Ahlus-Sunnah Wal-Jama’ah

the views of ahlus-sunnah towards the Sahâbah

*Are the Sahaba Hypocrites?

Ahl Al-Bait, ‘Ummahat Al-Mu’minin

*A Glimpse at the Way of the Companions Tasfiyah-wat- Tarbiyah

In Defense of Abu Hurairah [Reply to some erroneous claims]

ABANDONING ACTING ON WEAK AHAADEETH EVEN WITH REGARD TO its  EXCELLENT ACTION

Link : http://www.allaahuakbar.in/shiites/index.htm

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: